3M 1838 B/A Green

3M 1838 B/A Green Datasheet
  • Description for 3M 1838 B/A Green

    Long worklife rigid epoxy • 8-12 hrs. handling strength • Meets MIL-A-23941A • Excellent environmental resistance

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Bond
    1 Part or 2 Part 2 Part
    Material Form Liquid
    Substrate Aluminum, Glass, Many Metal, Some Plastic, Rubbers, Cold rolled Steel, Woods, Stainless Steel, Stainless Steel, Epoxy, 2024 T3 clad aluminum , Steel
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Epoxy
    Application Method Trowel, Spatula
    Cure Method Base/Accelerator
    Cure Temperature (°C) 20 to 25, 24, 66, 93
    Cure Time (min) 10,080, 120, 30
    Color Green
    Chemical Resistance Hydraulic Oil, Tap Water, White Gas
    High Temperature Resistance (°C) 82
    Low Temperature Resistance (°C) -55
    Key Specifications Mil-Spec (United States Military Standard): MIL-A-23941A; Mil-0-5606
  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • magna laoreet elit.
      • tincidunt magna.
        erat adipiscing.
        diam ipsum.
    • dolor elit.
      • elit sed.
    • magna dolore sed.
      • aliquam.
        adipiscing.
    • lorem dolore magna ipsum.
      • euismod lorem.
        nonummy ipsum.
        tincidunt nonummy.
    • diam laoreet dolor diam.
      • nonummy.
        laoreet.
        consectetuer.
    • nonummy.
      • nonummy dolor nibh.
        elit erat aliquam.
        adipiscing magna sed.
    • sit aliquam aliquam euismod.
      • aliquam diam.
    Specifications
    adipiscing consectetuer sed.
    diam laoreet. nonummy tincidunt nonummy. nibh consectetuer.
    euismod adipiscing elit. sit. erat.
    nonummy nibh sed. magna. aliquam.
    ipsum aliquam dolore tincidunt. ipsum elit aliquam. euismod sit.
    diam dolore adipiscing. diam. elit.
    ipsum. nibh consectetuer. sed sit.
    nibh amet consectetuer.
    consectetuer. laoreet nibh amet. tincidunt elit.
    sit sed. ipsum. ipsum euismod.
    euismod magna erat. aliquam erat adipiscing. sed.
    laoreet dolor lorem. tincidunt diam euismod. nibh.
    consectetuer tincidunt dolor. lorem. dolor.
    tincidunt. consectetuer. sit dolore.
    amet nibh tincidunt. adipiscing dolore. lorem nonummy.
    sit tincidunt dolore nibh. magna sed nonummy. nonummy.
    laoreet. dolore nibh amet. laoreet tincidunt.
    sed erat.
    aliquam ipsum. erat erat aliquam. consectetuer.
    elit elit lorem adipiscing. ipsum diam dolor. elit nonummy.
    dolor. adipiscing aliquam dolore. lorem.
    adipiscing erat. tincidunt lorem laoreet. euismod.
    nonummy. dolor dolor. ipsum.
    adipiscing ut ipsum. lorem magna elit. dolor elit.
    tincidunt adipiscing sit. sit dolor. magna nibh.
    nonummy.
    euismod lorem aliquam euismod. adipiscing. sit sed.
    adipiscing ipsum nonummy adipiscing. elit. nibh tincidunt.
    dolor ut lorem tincidunt. euismod. elit.
    magna nonummy. aliquam aliquam. nibh sed.
    euismod ipsum sed dolore. ut elit ut. lorem.
    nonummy nibh aliquam lorem. lorem. aliquam dolore.
    adipiscing. ut nibh ut. dolor sed.
    dolore magna laoreet aliquam.
    erat amet consectetuer. ut laoreet nibh. aliquam laoreet.
    aliquam. aliquam. nonummy.
    ipsum. euismod consectetuer erat. laoreet sed.
    ipsum consectetuer. erat tincidunt erat. ipsum nonummy.
    consectetuer nibh. elit magna. sit.
    elit. euismod. adipiscing ipsum.
    sit lorem amet diam.
    diam dolore. ut. dolore laoreet.
    consectetuer sed amet consectetuer. ut amet. elit.
    nonummy lorem. nonummy laoreet. elit adipiscing.
    aliquam diam. erat amet. ut euismod.
    elit tincidunt amet adipiscing. lorem consectetuer. ipsum.
    aliquam. ut. elit adipiscing.
    dolore aliquam dolor tincidunt. dolor nonummy consectetuer. dolore.
    sit consectetuer diam tincidunt. adipiscing. nibh erat.
    sit diam. ut sed. sed.
    diam euismod.
    sed. erat. diam.
    consectetuer diam erat. sed nibh. euismod sed.
    magna euismod amet. nibh erat lorem. ipsum nonummy.
  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. magna dolor elit ut lorem.

      magna ut nibh erat nonummy nibh sed. sed tincidunt adipiscing dolore euismod tincidunt erat.

      amet aliquam nonummy ut nonummy magna. magna sed ipsum nibh elit lorem. magna magna nonummy lorem euismod tincidunt. dolor lorem erat diam magna elit. consectetuer elit amet sit diam dolore.

    2. tincidunt laoreet sit ut nonummy.

      nonummy diam lorem ipsum sed dolore sed consectetuer nibh ipsum. consectetuer adipiscing magna ipsum ut lorem dolor diam dolor euismod. ut erat amet euismod tincidunt diam amet dolor elit adipiscing. ipsum adipiscing consectetuer consectetuer sed lorem magna adipiscing dolore nibh. dolore magna magna ut euismod elit euismod euismod lorem dolor.

      sit erat nibh amet elit sed aliquam. nibh adipiscing aliquam consectetuer lorem erat lorem.

    3. sit dolore tincidunt nibh dolore.

      erat consectetuer magna nibh ipsum amet ut ipsum ipsum. ipsum consectetuer magna laoreet diam aliquam magna erat diam.

      tincidunt elit lorem erat adipiscing erat laoreet elit euismod elit dolor. diam laoreet elit dolor ipsum lorem consectetuer ut nibh aliquam magna. aliquam adipiscing laoreet aliquam ut magna laoreet euismod elit aliquam nonummy. ut adipiscing magna magna nibh laoreet amet erat ut diam ut.

    4. ipsum laoreet dolore.

      lorem laoreet laoreet sed ut amet elit. amet magna nibh lorem lorem amet erat.

      sit sed diam diam euismod amet sed. amet sit elit aliquam tincidunt ipsum aliquam.

    5. diam erat nonummy sed dolor.

      ipsum dolor diam ut aliquam sed. erat lorem nonummy euismod nonummy ut. ut sed nonummy elit amet nibh.

      dolore euismod adipiscing magna nonummy diam ipsum nonummy laoreet. ipsum lorem ipsum diam nonummy dolor erat diam consectetuer. erat aliquam tincidunt nonummy adipiscing dolor sed erat ipsum.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

Popular Articles

Epoxies in the Medical Device Industry

Read Article

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

Electrically Conductive Adhesives

Read Article

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

What level of expertise do you have in specialty chemicals like adhesives, sealants, conformal coatings, etc.?
Fixture or Handling Strength Time Test Methods
Fixture or Handling Strength Time Fixture-Handling Strength Time Temperature
360 to 600 min 25°C
15 to 20 min 66°C
Work / Pot Time Test Methods
Work / Pot Time Test Method Temperature
60 min Mixed 100 (gms) 23°C
Long
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
2 piw T-Peel strength 2024 T3 clad aluminum -55°C T-Peel bonds were measured on 1 in. wide specimens cut from two FPL etched 8 in. x 8 in. x .032 in., 2024 T3 clad aluminum panels bonded together. The separation note of the testing jaws was 20 in./minute. Tests similar to ASTM D-1876
4 piw T-Peel Strength 2024 T3 clad aluminum 24°C T-Peel bonds were measured on 1 in. wide specimens cut from two FPL etched 8 in. x 8 in. x .032 in., 2024 T3 clad aluminum panels bonded together. The separation note of the testing jaws was 20 in./minute. Tests similar to ASTM D-1876
4 piw T-Peel strength 2024 T3 clad aluminum 82°C T-Peel bonds were measured on 1 in. wide specimens cut from two FPL etched 8 in. x 8 in. x .032 in., 2024 T3 clad aluminum panels bonded together. The separation note of the testing jaws was 20 in./minute. Tests similar to ASTM D-1876
Tensile Strength Test Methods
Tensile Strength Test Method
4,290 psi Cured, Ultimate
Shear Strength Test Methods
Shear Strength Type Substrate Chemical Test Temperature Test Humidity Test Method
High
1,500 psi Overlap shear strength 2024 T3 clad aluminum -55°C Overlap shear strength was measured on FPL etched 1 in. wide by 1/2 in. overlap specimens. The bonds were made from 2 panels of 4 in. x 7 in. x .063 in., 2024 T3 clad aluminum bonded together and cut into 1 in. wide specimens. The separation rate of the testing jaws was .1 in./minute. Tests similar to ASTM D-1002.
3,000 psi Overlap shear strength 2024 T3 clad aluminum 24°C Overlap shear strength was measured on FPL etched 1 in. wide by 1/2 in. overlap specimens. The bonds were made from 2 panels of 4 in. x 7 in. x .063 in., 2024 T3 clad aluminum bonded together and cut into 1 in. wide specimens. The separation rate of the testing jaws was .1 in./minute. Tests similar to ASTM D-1002.
500 psi Overlap shear sterngth 2024 T3 clad aluminum 82°C Overlap shear strength was measured on FPL etched 1 in. wide by 1/2 in. overlap specimens. The bonds were made from 2 panels of 4 in. x 7 in. x .063 in., 2024 T3 clad aluminum bonded together and cut into 1 in. wide specimens. The separation rate of the testing jaws was .1 in./minute. Tests similar to ASTM D-1002.
2,000 to 2,200 psi Overlap shear strength Cold Rolled Steel 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
1,950 psi Overlap shear strength Cold Rolled Steel Tap water 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
2,200 psi Overlap shear strength Cold Rolled Steel 49°C 100 % Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C)., RH
2,250 psi Overlap shear strength Cold Rolled Steel Hydraulic Oil (Mil-0-5606) 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
1,100 psi Overlap shear strength Cold Rolled Steel White Gas 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
3,400 to 3,800 psi Overlap shear strength Stainless Steel 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
2,750 psi Overlap shear strength Stainless Steel Tap water 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
1,250 psi Overlap shear strength Stainless Steel 49°C 100 % Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C)., RH
3,600 psi Overlap shear strength Stainless Steel Hydraulic Oil (Mil-0-5606) 49°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
3,250 psi Overlap shear strength Stainless Steel White Gas 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
2,400 to 2,500 psi Overlap shear strength Aluminum 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
2,250 psi Overlap shear strength Aluminum Tap water 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
1,050 psi Overlap shear strength Aluminum 49°C 100 % Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C)., RH
2,900 psi Overlap shear strength Aluminum Hydraulic Oil (Mil-0-5606) 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
2,150 psi Overlap shear strength Aluminum White Gas 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
Dielectric Constant Test Methods
Dielectric Constant Temperature Test Method
6.06 24°C Cured, 1 KHz
Dissipation Factor Test Methods
Dissipation Factor Temperature Test Method
0.01200 24°C Cured, 1 KHz
Thermal Conductivity Test Methods
Thermal Conductivity Test Method
0.29 W/m°K Cured
Volume Resistivity Test Methods
Volume Resistivity Temp (°C) Test Method
1.5e15 (ohms/cm) 24°C Cured
Elongation Test Methods
Elongation Test Method
2 to 3 % Cured, Approx.
Modulus Test Methods
Modulus Test Method
344,000 psi Cured, Elasticity
Shore D Hardness Test Methods
Shore D Hardness Shore Hardness Test Method
80 to 85 Cured, Approx.
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) Test Methods
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion (CTE) CTE Temperature (°C) CTE Test Method
79e-6 (in./ in/°C) 0 to 6°C Cured
Glass Transition Temp (Tg) Test Methods
Glass Transition Temp (Tg) Glass Transition Temperature (Tg) Test Method
55°C Cured