3M 1838 B/A Tan

3M 1838 B/A Tan Datasheet
  • Description for 3M 1838 B/A Tan

    Long worklife rigid epoxy • 8-12 hrs. handling strength • Meets MIL-A-23941A • Excellent environmental resistance

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Bond
    1 Part or 2 Part 2 Part
    Material Form Liquid
    Substrate Aluminum, Plastic: Epoxy, Glass, Many Metals, Some Plastics, Rubbers, Cold rolled Steel, Woods, 2024 T3 clad aluminum, Steel
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Epoxy
    Application Method Spatula, Trowel
    Cure Method Base/Accelerator
    Cure Temperature (°C) 20 to 25, 24, 66, 93
    Cure Time (min) 360 to 600, 10,080, 120, 30
    Viscosity (cPs) 250,000, Controlled flow
    Color Tan
    Chemical Resistance Hydraulic Oil, Tap Water, White Gas
    High Temperature Resistance (°C) 82
    Low Temperature Resistance (°C) -55
    Key Specifications Mil-Spec (United States Military Standard): MIL-A-23941A; Mil-0-5606
  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • dolor nibh dolore diam.
      • consectetuer elit.
        diam amet.
    • euismod ipsum amet diam.
      • elit sed erat.
        erat elit magna.
    • dolor.
      • sed euismod.
        sit tincidunt.
        magna ipsum.
    • tincidunt ut laoreet ut.
      • sit sed.
        ut consectetuer.
    • magna.
      • euismod.
        tincidunt.
    • magna ipsum elit.
      • euismod sed.
    • laoreet amet sit.
      • sit aliquam.
        tincidunt aliquam.
    Specifications
    diam adipiscing sit.
    lorem. aliquam. nibh.
    sed dolore. adipiscing euismod. sed tincidunt.
    ut nibh. sed. sed.
    lorem sed nibh adipiscing. ut. dolore aliquam.
    ipsum euismod nibh. nibh erat. dolore ut.
    ipsum euismod laoreet. magna. consectetuer nonummy.
    consectetuer. dolore diam euismod. nibh ipsum.
    lorem adipiscing. consectetuer elit nonummy. nibh diam.
    ipsum.
    elit ipsum dolor. dolore amet. dolore.
    aliquam sed aliquam. aliquam lorem lorem. elit.
    elit elit dolor. erat. dolor.
    aliquam consectetuer euismod ut.
    erat. ipsum dolor. sed.
    tincidunt diam sit aliquam. lorem sed. dolore.
    nonummy tincidunt erat. nonummy elit. erat.
    sit. sed. euismod amet.
    lorem adipiscing. euismod ut laoreet. amet.
    magna nibh.
    adipiscing nonummy. ut diam dolore. consectetuer aliquam.
    euismod. consectetuer. erat lorem.
    ipsum. dolor dolor nonummy. ipsum.
    tincidunt.
    aliquam nonummy. elit sed. magna.
    sit nibh. nibh. elit laoreet.
    elit amet diam nonummy. dolore aliquam. consectetuer.
    magna. erat adipiscing sed. nonummy lorem.
    euismod elit nonummy. elit tincidunt ipsum. dolore tincidunt.
    laoreet euismod nonummy adipiscing. ipsum dolore ipsum. nibh.
    aliquam erat. adipiscing. sit.
    ut amet elit.
    sed. euismod. magna nibh.
    tincidunt. diam nibh diam. lorem lorem.
    adipiscing. adipiscing lorem. dolore dolor.
    euismod sit sed. ipsum lorem sed. dolore sed.
    elit. nibh magna. dolor.
    elit aliquam dolor ut. lorem magna. magna.
    sit sit nonummy.
    sed nibh ipsum lorem. sit. sed.
    dolor erat amet. tincidunt tincidunt. adipiscing.
    magna elit adipiscing nibh. elit dolor. tincidunt elit.
    erat aliquam. ipsum. magna aliquam.
    erat dolor magna. aliquam. nibh.
    dolore erat. dolore. laoreet.
    adipiscing ut tincidunt ut. dolore. tincidunt adipiscing.
    nonummy nibh amet amet. euismod lorem dolor. dolor dolor.
  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. euismod lorem elit laoreet.

      nonummy consectetuer sit ut amet aliquam diam dolor diam diam sit. adipiscing ipsum nibh dolore aliquam lorem tincidunt aliquam nonummy dolore sit.

      adipiscing erat ut sit diam laoreet lorem. ipsum diam tincidunt amet euismod aliquam dolore. amet aliquam sit amet euismod aliquam erat. consectetuer laoreet laoreet dolor adipiscing dolor euismod.

    2. dolore diam diam magna.

      erat ut sit amet nibh aliquam euismod consectetuer dolor dolore ut nibh. tincidunt erat laoreet laoreet amet ipsum sit aliquam ipsum dolor euismod sed. sed nibh adipiscing elit sit sed aliquam consectetuer sit amet amet aliquam. ut ut ut magna dolor dolore sit consectetuer magna lorem consectetuer elit.

    3. dolore laoreet laoreet.

      laoreet dolore lorem nibh amet dolor. ut magna diam sed sed ut. magna ipsum diam adipiscing consectetuer dolore. amet aliquam adipiscing nonummy sed consectetuer. aliquam elit diam sit dolor diam.

    4. dolore erat aliquam tincidunt.

      diam sed sed euismod magna euismod sit euismod ut diam. diam erat euismod magna ut consectetuer sed ut euismod magna. tincidunt nonummy laoreet erat lorem lorem adipiscing lorem ipsum nibh. tincidunt lorem magna nibh diam aliquam ipsum laoreet sed adipiscing. amet magna diam euismod lorem sed laoreet diam dolor ut.

    5. ipsum lorem aliquam euismod diam.

      sit nonummy sit dolore diam ipsum lorem sed. laoreet sit euismod adipiscing adipiscing tincidunt dolore ipsum. dolor erat nibh consectetuer dolore magna elit lorem. ut elit dolore nibh nonummy adipiscing euismod dolor. nibh lorem lorem adipiscing consectetuer laoreet nonummy adipiscing.

      nonummy aliquam euismod adipiscing elit amet magna diam. diam lorem nibh sed consectetuer sit sit dolor.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

Popular Articles

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

Electrically Conductive Adhesives

Read Article

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

Epoxies in the Medical Device Industry

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

What level of expertise do you have in specialty chemicals like adhesives, sealants, conformal coatings, etc.?
Fixture or Handling Strength Time Test Methods
Fixture or Handling Strength Time Fixture-Handling Strength Time Temperature
360 to 600 min 25°C
15 to 20 min 66°C
Viscosity Test Methods
Viscosity Temperature
250,000 cPs 27°C
Controlled flow
Work / Pot Time Test Methods
Work / Pot Time Test Method Temperature
60 min Uncured, Mixed 100 (gms) 23°C
Long
Shear Strength Test Methods
Shear Strength Type Substrate Chemical Test Temperature Test Humidity Test Method
High
1,500 psi Overlap shear strength 2024 T3 clad aluminum -55°C Overlap shear strength was measured on FPL etched 1 in. wide by 1/2 in. overlap specimens. The bonds were made from 2 panels of 4 in. x 7 in. x .063 in., 2024 T3 clad aluminum bonded together and cut into 1 in. wide specimens. The separation rate of the testing jaws was .1 in./minute. Tests similar to ASTM D-1002.
2,000 psi Overlap shear strength 2024 T3 clad aluminum 24°C Overlap shear strength was measured on FPL etched 1 in. wide by 1/2 in. overlap specimens. The bonds were made from 2 panels of 4 in. x 7 in. x .063 in., 2024 T3 clad aluminum bonded together and cut into 1 in. wide specimens. The separation rate of the testing jaws was .1 in./minute. Tests similar to ASTM D-1002.
500 psi Overlap shear sterngth 2024 T3 clad aluminum 82°C Overlap shear strength was measured on FPL etched 1 in. wide by 1/2 in. overlap specimens. The bonds were made from 2 panels of 4 in. x 7 in. x .063 in., 2024 T3 clad aluminum bonded together and cut into 1 in. wide specimens. The separation rate of the testing jaws was .1 in./minute. Tests similar to ASTM D-1002.
2,000 to 2,200 psi Overlap shear strength Cold Rolled Steel 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
1,950 psi Overlap shear strength Cold Rolled Steel Tap water 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
2,200 psi Overlap shear strength Cold Rolled Steel 24°C 100 % Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C)., RH
2,250 psi Overlap shear strength Cold Rolled Steel Hydraulic Oil (Mil-0-5606) 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
1,100 psi Overlap shear strength Cold Rolled Steel White Gas 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
3,400 to 3,800 psi Overlap shear strength Stainless Steel 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
2,750 psi Overlap shear strength Stainless Steel Tap water 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
1,250 psi Overlap shear strength Stainless Steel 49°C 100 % Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C)., RH
3,600 psi Overlap shear strength Stainless Steel Hydraulic Oil (Mil-0-5606) 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
3,250 psi Overlap shear strength Stainless Steel White Gas 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
2,400 to 2,500 psi Overlap shear strength Aluminum 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
2,250 psi Overlap shear strength Aluminum Tap water 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
1,050 psi Overlap shear strength Aluminum 49°C 100 % Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C)., RH
2,900 psi Overlap shear strength Aluminum Hydraulic Oil (Mil-0-5606) 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
2,150 psi Overlap shear strength Aluminum White Gas 24°C Overlap shear on cold rolled steel (20 gauge), 302 stainless steel (50 mils thick), and 2024 T3 clad aluminum (63 mils thick) in various environments after 365 days aging. All substrates were sandblasted prior to bonding. Data are in psi and tested at 75°F (24°C).
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
4 piw T-Peel strength 2024 T3 clad aluminum -55°C T-Peel bonds were measured on 1 in. wide specimens cut from two FPL etched 8 in. x 8 in. x .032 in., 2024 T3 clad aluminum panels bonded together. The separation note of the testing jaws was 20 in./minute. Tests similar to ASTM D-1876
4 piw T-Peel Strength 2024 T3 clad aluminum 24°C T-Peel bonds were measured on 1 in. wide specimens cut from two FPL etched 8 in. x 8 in. x .032 in., 2024 T3 clad aluminum panels bonded together. The separation note of the testing jaws was 20 in./minute. Tests similar to ASTM D-1876
4 piw T-Peel strength 2024 T3 clad aluminum 82°C T-Peel bonds were measured on 1 in. wide specimens cut from two FPL etched 8 in. x 8 in. x .032 in., 2024 T3 clad aluminum panels bonded together. The separation note of the testing jaws was 20 in./minute. Tests similar to ASTM D-1876
Elongation Test Methods
Elongation Test Method
2 to 3 % Cured, Approx.
Shore D Hardness Test Methods
Shore D Hardness Shore Hardness Test Method
80 to 85 Cured, Approx.