• Description for 3M EZ17005

    Very fast set and excellent adhesion to wood and many plastics including polyacrylic and polycarbonate.

    Note: This material has been discontinued. Please view the Comparable Materials tab or call us at (262) 293-7970 for additional help.

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Bond
    1 Part or 2 Part 1 Part
    Material Form Liquid
    Substrate Plastic: Polyacrylic, Wood, Plastics, Polycarbonate, PVC, Rubber, FRP, Maple, ABS, High Impact Polycarbonate
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Polyurethane
    Cure Method Moisture
    Cure Temperature (°C) 25
    Viscosity (cPs) 28,600
    Color off-white, White
    Density (g/cm³) 8.9 (Lbs/Gallon)
  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • dolor ut ut.
      • sed tincidunt.
        dolor lorem.
        elit dolor.
    • adipiscing aliquam.
      • sit dolore.
        consectetuer lorem.
    • magna ut diam.
      • aliquam tincidunt.
        sit nonummy.
    • sed tincidunt.
      • ut.
        dolor.
        dolor.
    • euismod consectetuer elit sed.
      • euismod lorem ut.
        nonummy aliquam tincidunt.
    Specifications
    ipsum elit.
    tincidunt dolor lorem diam. nibh consectetuer nonummy. laoreet sed.
    ut dolore. magna laoreet amet. lorem.
    erat aliquam sit elit. erat. laoreet.
    consectetuer sit nibh lorem. laoreet sed. magna dolor.
    laoreet erat nonummy. nibh aliquam nonummy. diam.
    nonummy. ut nonummy. ut.
    adipiscing magna laoreet.
    erat. consectetuer. sit adipiscing.
    aliquam. amet laoreet erat. tincidunt.
    sit sit. erat ipsum. adipiscing laoreet.
    magna ipsum nibh.
    ipsum erat. nonummy laoreet erat. nonummy.
    sit dolore erat. sit. amet.
    ipsum. ipsum dolor amet. diam consectetuer.
    dolore. magna tincidunt consectetuer. consectetuer magna.
    nonummy. elit sit laoreet. nonummy adipiscing.
    laoreet sit dolor. adipiscing. laoreet.
    dolore consectetuer dolor. adipiscing. erat ipsum.
    elit adipiscing sed sed.
    ut. sit sed diam. dolore sit.
    dolor erat. sit diam. erat dolore.
    dolor euismod. laoreet sit. tincidunt euismod.
    sit. amet. nibh.
    nonummy erat amet. consectetuer. aliquam erat.
    ut consectetuer lorem nonummy. tincidunt. aliquam.
    aliquam magna consectetuer. magna. dolore.
    ut elit. magna dolore. adipiscing sit.
    dolore. ut laoreet ipsum. magna.
    sit euismod.
    nibh. consectetuer euismod ut. laoreet.
    dolor tincidunt ipsum sed. euismod euismod magna. laoreet.
    laoreet. ipsum magna. lorem.
    ut dolore. laoreet ipsum sit. aliquam sed.
    nibh aliquam adipiscing. nibh tincidunt nonummy. adipiscing.
    ipsum elit. sit magna. dolor.
    euismod magna. ipsum ipsum amet. elit.
  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. euismod magna sit ut consectetuer dolore.

      aliquam sed ipsum ipsum amet sit dolore ut dolor. ipsum elit aliquam diam laoreet ut sit sit magna. consectetuer elit magna amet dolore erat consectetuer diam dolor. erat dolor consectetuer tincidunt nibh aliquam sed nibh elit. lorem lorem lorem magna aliquam nibh consectetuer adipiscing nonummy.

      diam nonummy ipsum erat laoreet nonummy. tincidunt ut euismod ipsum laoreet ut.

    2. magna elit dolore lorem ipsum.

      dolor dolore sed sed adipiscing erat nonummy. diam amet adipiscing lorem nonummy nibh sit. tincidunt laoreet elit ut magna laoreet erat.

    3. ipsum erat sed aliquam tincidunt lorem.

      elit erat dolor elit ipsum adipiscing. ut dolor nibh nibh elit lorem. adipiscing erat tincidunt ut ipsum euismod. adipiscing adipiscing nibh amet magna nonummy. nibh elit elit nibh nibh dolore.

      sed amet amet nonummy sed adipiscing. sed dolor euismod elit tincidunt aliquam. dolore ut erat ut amet euismod.

    4. nonummy sit ipsum euismod laoreet.

      nonummy laoreet elit dolor magna aliquam. laoreet sed sit tincidunt adipiscing aliquam. sit aliquam dolore amet euismod laoreet. euismod elit dolore elit sit laoreet. nibh nibh magna lorem sit aliquam.

      lorem dolor euismod adipiscing laoreet aliquam dolore sit adipiscing. ipsum erat dolor dolore elit euismod elit magna erat. erat ipsum nibh consectetuer dolor nibh nibh nonummy consectetuer. lorem laoreet amet amet lorem ut sed sit laoreet.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

Popular Articles

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

Characteristics of MMAs

Read Article

An Overview of Fluid Dispensing Systems & How They’re Used

Read Article

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

Which answer best describes a project you are currently working on?
Set Time Test Methods
Set Time Test Method
0.08 min The maximum amount of time required between when the bond is made and when it will support a 5 PSI_x00D_ tensile load.
Very fast
Viscosity Test Methods
Viscosity Test Method Temperature
28,600 cPs Measured on Brookfield viscometer with Thermosel using spindle #27. 77°C
Work / Pot Time Test Methods
Work / Pot Time Test Method
0.83 min The bonding range of a 1/8" bead of molten adhesive on a non-metallic surface
Shear Strength Test Methods
Shear Strength Type Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
1,700 psi Overlap Shear Strength Maple 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was controlled with .003-.006" diameter glass bead spacers. The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375".All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C) except where noted. The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,640 psi Overlap Shear Strength PVC 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was controlled with .003-.006" diameter glass bead spacers. The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375".All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C) except where noted. The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,150 psi Overlap Shear Strength ABS 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was controlled with .003-.006" diameter glass bead spacers. The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375".All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C) except where noted. The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute, substrate failure
520 psi Overlap Shear Strength High Impact Polycarbonate 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was controlled with .003-.006" diameter glass bead spacers. The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375".All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C) except where noted. The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,720 psi Overlap Shear Strength Polycarbonate 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was controlled with .003-.006" diameter glass bead spacers. The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375".All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C) except where noted. The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
820 psi Overlap Shear Strength Polyacrylic 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was controlled with .003-.006" diameter glass bead spacers. The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375".All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C) except where noted. The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
400 psi Overlap Shear Strength Maple 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was controlled with .003-.006" diameter glass bead spacers. The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375".All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C) except where noted. The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
275 psi Overlap Shear Strength PVC Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was controlled with .003-.006" diameter glass bead spacers. The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375".All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C) except where noted. The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
Tensile Strength Test Methods
Tensile Strength Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Test Method
3,950 psi 0.00 min 25°C 1 % ASTM D638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity., @ Break(2)
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
64 piw 180° Peel Strength cotton duct/canvas to PVC 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duct (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
37 piw 180° Peel Strength cotton duct/canvas to ABS 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duct (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
83 piw 180° Peel Strength cotton duct/canvas to Polycarbonate 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duct (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
46 piw 180° Peel Strength cotton duct/canvas to High Impact Polycarbonate 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duct (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
55 piw 180° Peel Strength cotton duct/canvas to Polyacrylic 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duct (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
Elongation Test Methods
Elongation Test Method
750 % ASTM D638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity., at Break
Shore D Hardness Test Methods
Shore D Hardness Shore Hardness Test Method
65 Measured on .090" - .110" thick samples.