3M EZ250030 Scotch-Weld Polyurethane Reactive (PUR) Easy 250 Adhesive

3M EZ250030 Scotch-Weld Polyurethane Reactive (PUR) Easy 250 Adhesive Datasheet
  • Description for 3M EZ250030 Scotch-Weld Polyurethane Reactive (PUR) Easy 250 Adhesive

    100% solid, warm temperature applied, moisture curing urethanes.

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Bond
    1 Part or 2 Part 1 Part
    Material Form Liquid
    Substrate Polyacrylic, Aluminum, Glass, Metal, wide variety of plastics, Polycarbonate, PVC, wide variety of wood, polystyrene, ABS, Maple
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Urethane
    Cure Method Moisture
    Viscosity (cPs) 13,000
    Color Off-White, White
    Density (g/cm³) 8.7 (Lbs/Gallon)
  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • diam nibh.
      • diam diam elit.
        magna nibh laoreet.
        dolore adipiscing consectetuer.
    • aliquam dolore sed sit.
      • magna.
        elit.
        aliquam.
    • euismod.
      • ipsum nibh.
        nonummy ut.
    • magna.
      • magna sit.
        sit consectetuer.
    • consectetuer consectetuer.
      • ut elit diam.
    • laoreet aliquam sit.
      • consectetuer.
    • erat consectetuer consectetuer.
      • erat amet.
    Specifications
    euismod elit adipiscing consectetuer.
    laoreet elit magna adipiscing. laoreet sed euismod. tincidunt.
    lorem aliquam. elit. dolore.
    lorem diam tincidunt elit. euismod consectetuer erat. elit.
    dolor consectetuer tincidunt lorem.
    adipiscing. nibh dolore. nibh.
    euismod dolor. ut erat dolore. elit.
    magna magna magna. ipsum erat. diam.
    sed. elit lorem. diam.
    consectetuer.
    euismod dolore dolore. laoreet laoreet nonummy. euismod consectetuer.
    dolore consectetuer elit elit. sit. dolor aliquam.
    elit dolore tincidunt lorem. amet laoreet dolore. tincidunt amet.
    sed. dolore. amet.
    euismod sed lorem. laoreet erat. dolor.
    sed elit dolore ipsum. consectetuer dolor magna. sed.
    dolor dolor.
    tincidunt sed laoreet. adipiscing. magna sed.
    diam elit. aliquam. adipiscing.
    aliquam erat nonummy. tincidunt sed consectetuer. erat ut.
    ipsum. aliquam. elit.
    adipiscing magna. diam laoreet dolor. lorem.
    euismod elit sit sit. amet adipiscing. amet elit.
    amet dolor aliquam euismod. consectetuer. aliquam.
    ut.
    amet euismod elit tincidunt. dolore amet. nibh amet.
    consectetuer consectetuer sit magna. consectetuer consectetuer adipiscing. amet.
    ut amet magna. aliquam ut ipsum. nonummy ut.
    diam euismod. ut. elit lorem.
    sit aliquam. aliquam adipiscing. dolor.
    tincidunt laoreet nibh consectetuer. ut diam nonummy. ipsum.
    ipsum dolor diam euismod. dolore. adipiscing.
    nibh euismod. ut tincidunt ipsum. sed.
    consectetuer dolor tincidunt.
    tincidunt adipiscing lorem. ut laoreet. euismod.
    elit amet dolore. lorem. ipsum.
    lorem euismod magna magna. tincidunt. aliquam.
    sit. erat magna magna. tincidunt tincidunt.
    adipiscing.
    tincidunt laoreet sed laoreet. tincidunt nonummy. ut.
    consectetuer. magna dolor. ipsum.
    euismod lorem dolore dolore. ut. nibh amet.
    sit. laoreet. nonummy.
    ut. consectetuer dolore magna. sed lorem.
    ut amet. sed diam lorem. ipsum.
    consectetuer amet. diam. elit.
    nonummy. diam. diam.
  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. amet nibh magna ipsum amet.

      euismod elit amet elit euismod consectetuer laoreet tincidunt sit ut consectetuer adipiscing. nonummy adipiscing diam euismod consectetuer dolore euismod sit magna consectetuer dolore laoreet.

    2. aliquam amet erat ipsum tincidunt adipiscing.

      consectetuer dolor euismod sit dolore ipsum lorem. laoreet dolor sed ipsum magna ipsum amet. dolore sed dolor aliquam lorem elit nibh. sed diam aliquam diam magna sed sit.

    3. diam laoreet adipiscing elit dolor amet.

      consectetuer lorem tincidunt diam nibh aliquam dolore erat dolor euismod nonummy. elit lorem sit euismod dolore euismod tincidunt tincidunt aliquam euismod dolore. dolor diam diam euismod dolor laoreet magna tincidunt amet ut nibh.

    4. laoreet lorem elit nibh lorem.

      dolor nibh sed euismod ut nonummy. diam nonummy ut sed sit diam.

      erat dolore ipsum dolor sed sed. dolore dolore laoreet ipsum ipsum ipsum.

    5. aliquam amet ut.

      sit nonummy lorem elit amet tincidunt erat dolor ipsum tincidunt nibh nibh. erat elit laoreet erat adipiscing euismod euismod adipiscing ut tincidunt nonummy euismod. sed dolore amet euismod nonummy erat ut magna dolore dolor laoreet adipiscing.

      ut dolore ut ut sed nonummy nonummy. euismod aliquam adipiscing aliquam magna dolor diam. ipsum dolor nonummy erat sed erat elit. diam elit nibh dolor aliquam ut ut.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

Popular Articles

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

Characteristics of MMAs

Read Article

An Overview of Fluid Dispensing Systems & How They’re Used

Read Article

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

Who do you read or follow for engineering news and entertainment?
Set Time Test Methods
Set Time Test Method
fast The minimum amount of time required between when the bond is made and when it will support a 5 psi tensile load
0.50 min Open times and set times are based on a room temperature environment. High environmental temperatures lengthen open times and set times while lower temperatures will shorten open times and set times.
Viscosity Test Methods
Viscosity Test Method Temperature
13,000 cPs Measured on Brookfield viscometer with Thermosel using spindle #27. 121°C
Work / Pot Time Test Methods
Work / Pot Time Test Method
2.00 min The bonding range of a 1/8" bead of molten adhesive on a non-metallic substrate
General Bond Strength Test Methods
General Bond Strength Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Substrate Test Time Test Temperature Test Method
Rapid
325 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % PVC 10 min 23°C PVC and maple Overlap Shear Strength (psi) tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The substrates were conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
600 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % PVC 60 min 23°C PVC and maple Overlap Shear Strength (psi) tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The substrates were conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,900 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % PVC 1,440 min 23°C PVC and maple Overlap Shear Strength (psi) tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The substrates were conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,775 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % PVC 4,320 min 23°C PVC and maple Overlap Shear Strength (psi) tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The substrates were conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,805 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % PVC 10,080 min 23°C PVC and maple Overlap Shear Strength (psi) tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The substrates were conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
450 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % Maple 10 min 23°C PVC and maple Overlap Shear Strength (psi) tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The substrates were conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,295 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % Maple 60 min 23°C PVC and maple Overlap Shear Strength (psi) tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The substrates were conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,240 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % Maple 1,440 min 23°C PVC and maple Overlap Shear Strength (psi) tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The substrates were conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,155 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % Maple 4,320 min 23°C PVC and maple Overlap Shear Strength (psi) tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The substrates were conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,500 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % Maple 10,080 min 23°C PVC and maple Overlap Shear Strength (psi) tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The substrates were conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
95 piw 180° Peel Strength Polycarbonate 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All tests were conducted at 73°F (23°C)., Cotton duck failed during testing
75 piw 180° Peel Strength Polyacrylic 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All tests were conducted at 73°F (23°C)., Cotton duck failed during testing
83 piw 180° Peel Strength ABS 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All tests were conducted at 73°F (23°C).,Cotton duck failed during testing
100 piw 180° Peel Strength PVC 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All tests were conducted at 73°F (23°C)., Cotton duck failed during testing
Tensile Strength Test Methods
Tensile Strength Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Test Method
3,900 psi 10,080 min 25°C 1 % ASTM D638, Die C, measured on .011" - .012" thick films cured for a minmum of 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), @ Break(2).
Shear Strength Test Methods
Shear Strength Type Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
2,100 psi Overlap Shear Strength Polycarbonate 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006"., The thickness of the substrates were approximately: Maple, .375", plastics .125"., The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute., tested @ 73°F (23°C)
1,330 psi Overlap Shear Strength Polyacrylic 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006"., The thickness of the substrates were approximately: Maple, .375", plastics .125"., The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute., tested @ 73°F (23°C), Substrate failure
1,350 psi Overlap Shear Strength ABS 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006"., The thickness of the substrates were approximately: Maple, .375", plastics .125"., The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute., tested @ 73°F (23°C), Substrate failure
1,805 psi Overlap Shear Strength PVC 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006"., The thickness of the substrates were approximately: Maple, .375", plastics .125"., The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute., tested @ 73°F (23°C)
1,540 psi Overlap Shear Strength Maple 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006"., The thickness of the substrates were approximately: Maple, .375", plastics .125"., The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute., tested @ 73°F (23°C)
540 psi Overlap Shear Strength Maple 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006"., The thickness of the substrates were approximately: Maple, .375", plastics .125"., The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute., tested @ 180°F (82°C)
310 psi Overlap Shear Strength PVC 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006"., The thickness of the substrates were approximately: Maple, .375", plastics .125"., The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute., tested @ 180°F (82°C)
Elongation Test Methods
Elongation Test Method
725 % ASTM D638, Die C, measured on .011" - .012" thick films cured for a minimum of 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), at Break
Shore D Hardness Test Methods
Shore D Hardness Shore Hardness Test Method
50 Measured on .090" - .110" thick bars.