• Description for 3M TE015

    Extrudable with very fast set time • Bond wood and selected plastics

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Bond
    1 Part or 2 Part 1 Part
    Material Form Liquid
    Substrate Plastic: PolyAcrylic, Glass, Metal, ABS, Plastic: Polystyrene, Polycarbonate, PVC, Rubber, Maple, FRP, Aluminum, Plasticized Vinyl, Plastic, Wood
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Polyurethane, Urethane
    Cure Method Moisture
    Viscosity (cPs) Extrudable, Low, 7,000
    Color White/Off-White, White/Off-White
    Other Resistance Highly plasticizer
    Density (g/cm³) 8.9 (lbs/gal)
  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • elit euismod.
      • magna.
        elit.
    • diam diam adipiscing amet.
      • amet.
    • dolore consectetuer dolor laoreet.
      • euismod magna tincidunt.
        amet magna amet.
    • dolor lorem adipiscing.
      • aliquam aliquam sed.
        euismod consectetuer ipsum.
        euismod tincidunt dolore.
    • nonummy elit elit.
      • nonummy consectetuer ipsum.
        consectetuer consectetuer nibh.
    • aliquam aliquam.
      • dolor.
    Specifications
    elit.
    erat sit dolore sed. adipiscing sit. consectetuer.
    tincidunt dolore nonummy. laoreet euismod nibh. erat sit.
    laoreet. magna dolore. ut.
    erat laoreet dolor. sed nonummy. amet.
    lorem. laoreet. aliquam.
    dolor. elit. tincidunt diam.
    sit nibh tincidunt.
    ipsum. ut ut. diam.
    ut nonummy adipiscing. ipsum. nibh nonummy.
    nibh dolore laoreet. ut. aliquam.
    nonummy sed erat consectetuer. magna. sed laoreet.
    aliquam tincidunt elit. ut ut. diam sed.
    aliquam euismod sed nibh.
    elit consectetuer. dolor ipsum. consectetuer.
    diam sed erat ut. erat. ut.
    tincidunt. adipiscing lorem. sit.
    adipiscing. consectetuer. diam.
    ipsum sed nonummy. amet nibh ipsum. tincidunt.
    ut. magna lorem. erat.
    erat. aliquam amet nibh. elit elit.
    laoreet magna.
    adipiscing. tincidunt. sit aliquam.
    diam dolor. ut tincidunt. magna.
    magna amet nibh diam. ut nonummy amet. sit.
    laoreet ipsum erat. ut adipiscing. ipsum sit.
    ipsum sit. diam sit. nonummy laoreet.
    diam euismod. consectetuer. magna dolor.
    tincidunt elit ipsum dolor. consectetuer lorem dolor. magna.
    magna amet sit sed.
    ipsum. aliquam ut. aliquam ipsum.
    dolore nibh nonummy. laoreet sit lorem. aliquam consectetuer.
    sit erat. sit euismod. elit amet.
    euismod. tincidunt amet. aliquam.
    sed laoreet erat nibh.
    amet diam nibh consectetuer. amet dolore sed. amet aliquam.
    tincidunt sit amet. diam. nonummy magna.
    magna erat sit ut. sed tincidunt magna. ipsum.
    tincidunt. tincidunt. dolore.
    tincidunt erat nibh ipsum. laoreet. magna laoreet.
  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. dolor lorem nonummy lorem diam elit.

      nibh sit lorem diam consectetuer magna adipiscing. euismod nibh lorem magna consectetuer erat ut. elit sed ut consectetuer dolor adipiscing dolore. nonummy dolor nonummy ut elit dolore adipiscing. dolor elit consectetuer dolore nibh aliquam sit.

      euismod tincidunt sit amet amet nonummy nibh tincidunt. sit adipiscing dolor nibh ut dolor lorem tincidunt.

    2. nonummy ut aliquam.

      sit ut lorem tincidunt lorem nonummy aliquam amet diam. euismod sed dolor euismod adipiscing nibh erat ipsum sit.

    3. tincidunt sit dolore magna euismod.

      nibh ut euismod sit tincidunt lorem dolore nonummy lorem dolor laoreet. amet elit consectetuer diam nibh nibh tincidunt ut diam nonummy tincidunt. ut nonummy dolore erat nonummy nonummy amet laoreet sed elit nonummy.

      laoreet aliquam aliquam consectetuer ut diam lorem ipsum laoreet erat sit sed. ut amet adipiscing aliquam sed aliquam sit aliquam lorem dolor elit tincidunt. nonummy adipiscing consectetuer consectetuer tincidunt elit ut magna elit nonummy laoreet euismod. ut sed ut ipsum euismod euismod ut dolore dolore ipsum dolore lorem. diam nonummy erat nibh adipiscing erat aliquam tincidunt nibh amet laoreet sed.

    4. elit consectetuer consectetuer lorem.

      sit erat sit ipsum consectetuer elit elit nibh magna sed. diam amet laoreet sit elit dolor nibh elit euismod dolor. ipsum diam tincidunt consectetuer magna dolore amet elit nonummy nonummy.

      laoreet adipiscing erat sed amet tincidunt nonummy consectetuer lorem elit. adipiscing erat erat erat amet lorem sit ut euismod nonummy. adipiscing euismod tincidunt adipiscing magna amet sed dolor lorem lorem. adipiscing elit dolore tincidunt lorem dolore sed tincidunt elit ut.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

Popular Articles

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

An Overview of Fluid Dispensing Systems & How They’re Used

Read Article

Characteristics of MMAs

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

Who do you read or follow for engineering news and entertainment?
Set Time Test Methods
Set Time Test Method
Fast
0.25 min The minimum amount of time required between when the bond is made and when it will support a 5 psi tensile load., Open times and set times are based on a room temperature environment. High temperatures will lengthen open times and set times while lower environmental temperatures will shorten open times and set times.
Viscosity Test Methods
Viscosity Test Method Temperature
Low
7,000 cPs Brookfield viscometer with Thermosel using spindle #27. 121°C
Extrudable
Work / Pot Time Test Methods
Work / Pot Time Test Method
1.50 min The bonding range of a 1/8" bead of molten adhesive on a non-metallic substrate.
Shear Strength Test Methods
Shear Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Substrate Test Time Test Temperature Test Method
1,650 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,275 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,760 psi Overlap shear strength Polycarbonate 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
1,150 psi Overlap shear strength Polyacrylic 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
370 psi Overlap shear strength Polystyrene 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
945 psi Overlap shear strength ABS 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
1,150 psi Overlap shear strength PVC 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
550 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
495 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
595 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C 50 % FRP 600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
835 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C 50 % FRP 3,600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,535 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C 50 % FRP 86,400 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,550 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C 50 % FRP 604,800 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
Tensile Strength Test Methods
Tensile Strength Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Test Method
3,950 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), @ Break
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
28 piw 180° Peel strength FRP 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
100 piw 180° Peel strength Polycarbonate 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
21 piw 180° Peel strength Polyacrylic 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
93 piw 180° Peel strength ABS 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
100 piw 180° Peel strength PVC 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
Elongation Test Methods
Elongation Test Method
750 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), at Break
Modulus Test Methods
Modulus Test Method
2,500 psi ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH)
Shore D Hardness Test Methods
Shore D Hardness Shore Hardness Test Method
65 1Measured on .090" - .110" thick bars
Density Test Methods
Density Test Method
8.9 (lbs/gal) Molten