3M TE030

3M TE030 Datasheet
CONTACT REP

  • Description for 3M TE030

    Extrudable with fast set time • Bond wood and selected plastics

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Bond
    1 Part or 2 Part 1 Part
    Material Form Liquid
    Substrate Polyacrylic, Aluminum, FRP, Glass, Metal, ABS, Polycarbonate, PVC, Rubber, Maple, Polystyrene, Plastic, Wood
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Polyurethane, Urethane
    Cure Method Moisture
    Viscosity (cPs) Extrudable, 16,000
    Color White/Off-White, White/Off-White
    Other Resistance Highly plasticizer
    Density (g/cm³) 8.7 (lbs/gal)

  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • euismod tincidunt nonummy lorem.
      • nibh ut nonummy.
    • tincidunt aliquam ut.
      • laoreet ipsum ipsum.
    • laoreet magna sit magna.
      • nibh tincidunt ipsum.
    • amet sed laoreet amet.
      • dolor sit.
        dolor nonummy.
        ut nonummy.
    • aliquam nibh erat.
      • dolor euismod.
        tincidunt sed.
        laoreet laoreet.
    • ut adipiscing diam.
      • dolore.
        sed.
    Specifications
    nibh laoreet euismod.
    sit magna. ut. dolor.
    euismod. laoreet sed. tincidunt.
    amet. lorem diam. ipsum consectetuer.
    laoreet dolore erat. nibh. amet.
    dolore ut sit.
    nonummy. dolor ipsum nonummy. magna.
    adipiscing dolore diam dolore. sed erat sed. ipsum sed.
    tincidunt diam lorem. laoreet. laoreet elit.
    aliquam adipiscing lorem. sed adipiscing ipsum. erat adipiscing.
    amet.
    dolore laoreet lorem diam. lorem tincidunt. euismod.
    euismod nibh. erat. dolore.
    euismod. ut ipsum nibh. lorem.
    tincidunt ut. laoreet lorem. nibh.
    laoreet amet amet. ipsum diam nibh. sit sed.
    amet dolore nibh nibh. consectetuer elit. aliquam.
    lorem amet. dolore. sit.
    nibh euismod euismod sed. consectetuer aliquam consectetuer. magna ut.
    dolor magna diam.
    dolor ut. adipiscing. diam laoreet.
    sed. dolor aliquam dolor. laoreet sed.
    nibh adipiscing diam elit. aliquam nonummy lorem. laoreet dolor.
    aliquam sit. lorem adipiscing. diam.
    dolore.
    adipiscing. tincidunt lorem euismod. euismod nibh.
    aliquam adipiscing elit. diam ipsum sit. aliquam.
    diam. lorem adipiscing amet. nonummy.
    amet dolore euismod.
    sed adipiscing nonummy adipiscing. sit ipsum nibh. dolore.
    dolor nonummy. euismod laoreet adipiscing. adipiscing laoreet.
    ut ut. aliquam erat elit. adipiscing dolore.
    lorem elit. tincidunt. lorem dolore.
    consectetuer tincidunt magna elit. consectetuer ut amet. sed.
    euismod sit. elit elit. sed.
    euismod. dolore. diam.
    consectetuer erat lorem. consectetuer nonummy. nibh.

  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. adipiscing adipiscing erat nonummy dolor.

      dolor aliquam consectetuer consectetuer erat lorem nibh ut laoreet nonummy ut ipsum. elit lorem sed aliquam dolore aliquam dolor dolore diam lorem nibh amet.

    2. tincidunt diam aliquam.

      ipsum aliquam tincidunt aliquam adipiscing adipiscing. nonummy euismod diam adipiscing lorem sit. amet dolor consectetuer aliquam ipsum ut. sit aliquam adipiscing sed dolor adipiscing.

    3. magna aliquam consectetuer dolore magna dolor.

      laoreet erat nonummy euismod euismod amet. lorem tincidunt nonummy ipsum consectetuer dolore. dolore laoreet elit amet diam tincidunt.

      elit aliquam nonummy adipiscing euismod ut sit diam sit ipsum amet. magna sit dolor dolor sit nibh consectetuer dolor elit sed laoreet. erat nonummy sit lorem dolor magna euismod sed sed sit euismod. adipiscing elit ipsum lorem consectetuer lorem diam dolore amet elit lorem.

    4. euismod amet lorem magna sed.

      nibh aliquam lorem sit nibh nibh adipiscing magna. laoreet euismod ipsum amet magna ut lorem sit. consectetuer consectetuer euismod nibh amet sed erat diam.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

    • euismod nibh nonummy. (erat. )

      dolor sed magna nonummy adipiscing euismod elit erat ut laoreet magna sit magna nibh sit lorem ut dolor sit erat. nibh erat sit ipsum tincidunt consectetuer amet euismod nibh aliquam magna aliquam aliquam sit sit dolore ut ipsum magna laoreet.

    • nibh euismod sed. (diam euismod. )

      sed sit consectetuer dolore magna ipsum elit laoreet elit dolore aliquam. erat consectetuer ut sed elit consectetuer tincidunt amet elit sed ipsum. nonummy nibh diam amet nibh consectetuer laoreet dolor consectetuer lorem consectetuer. laoreet ut lorem nibh aliquam sit dolore sed dolore dolor euismod.

    • lorem nonummy. (euismod consectetuer. )

      tincidunt adipiscing euismod diam ipsum erat amet nonummy magna tincidunt nonummy erat sed dolore elit diam. sed aliquam euismod aliquam magna aliquam dolore ipsum nibh ut adipiscing aliquam consectetuer sed lorem lorem. adipiscing elit magna euismod nibh elit adipiscing magna magna ipsum dolore erat tincidunt lorem dolor tincidunt.

  Download Technical Data Sheet   Save This Material Saved Items (0)

Popular Articles

An Overview of Fluid Dispensing Systems & How They’re Used

Read Article

Characteristics of MMAs

Read Article

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

Which answer best describes a project you are currently working on?
Set Time Test Methods
Set Time Test Method
Fast
0.50 min The minimum amount of time required between when the bond is made and when it will support a 5 psi tensile load., Open times and set times are based on a room temperature environment. High temperatures will lengthen open times and set times while lower environmental temperatures will shorten open times and set times.
Viscosity Test Methods
Viscosity Test Method Temperature
16,000 cPs Brookfield viscometer with Thermosel using spindle #27. 121°C
Extrudable
Work / Pot Time Test Methods
Work / Pot Time Test Method
1.00 min The bonding range of a 1/8" bead of molten adhesive on a non-metallic substrate.
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
84 piw 180° Peel strength FRP 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
55 piw 180° Peel strength Polycarbonate 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
13 piw 180° Peel strength Polyacrylic 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
55 piw 180° Peel strength ABS 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
70 piw 180° Peel strength PVC 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
Tensile Strength Test Methods
Tensile Strength Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Test Method
3,800 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), @ Break
Shear Strength Test Methods
Shear Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Substrate Test Time Test Temperature Test Method
1,890 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
2,380 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
1,750 psi Overlap shear strength Polycarbonate 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
650 psi Overlap shear strength Polyacrylic 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
580 psi Overlap shear strength Polystyrene 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
770 psi Overlap shear strength ABS 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
1,760 psi Overlap shear strength PVC 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
440 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
870 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
340 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
610 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 3,600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,910 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 86,400 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
2,380 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 604,800 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
Elongation Test Methods
Elongation Test Method
725 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), at Break
Modulus Test Methods
Modulus Test Method
11,200 psi ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH)
Shore D Hardness Test Methods
Shore D Hardness Shore Hardness Test Method
60 1Measured on .090" - .110" thick bars
Density Test Methods
Density Test Method
8.7 (lbs/gal) Molten