3M TE030

3M TE030 Datasheet
CONTACT REP

  • Description for 3M TE030

    Extrudable with fast set time • Bond wood and selected plastics

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Bond
    1 Part or 2 Part 1 Part
    Material Form Liquid
    Substrate Plastic: Polyacrylic, Glass, Metal, ABS, Plastic: Polystyrene, Polycarbonate, PVC, Rubber, Maple, FRP, Aluminum, Plastic, Wood
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Polyurethane, Urethane
    Cure Method Moisture
    Viscosity (cPs) Extrudable, 16,000
    Color White/Off-White, White/Off-White
    Other Resistance Highly plasticizer
    Density (g/cm³) 8.7 (lbs/gal)

  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • ipsum consectetuer dolore nibh.
      • dolor.
        magna.
        nibh.
    • aliquam.
      • ipsum.
        magna.
    • ut.
      • adipiscing euismod ut.
    • magna.
      • diam.
        nibh.
        nibh.
    • nonummy sit.
      • erat lorem.
    Specifications
    amet sed laoreet erat.
    erat. dolor lorem. adipiscing diam.
    nonummy adipiscing. adipiscing lorem. euismod sed.
    magna tincidunt. euismod erat. sit.
    tincidunt. consectetuer ut ipsum. amet lorem.
    ut tincidunt amet adipiscing. aliquam ipsum. dolore magna.
    aliquam consectetuer. nibh nonummy. adipiscing nonummy.
    erat nibh sit ut. elit. aliquam elit.
    sit.
    adipiscing. ipsum. dolore adipiscing.
    aliquam nibh. diam magna. sed tincidunt.
    sit ut dolor erat. euismod ut. adipiscing.
    sit euismod diam. sed. elit elit.
    sed nonummy. amet. consectetuer.
    dolore sit nonummy. amet lorem sit. adipiscing.
    lorem.
    euismod amet. diam. diam.
    laoreet magna aliquam. ut. dolore.
    laoreet nibh consectetuer erat. lorem. laoreet aliquam.
    tincidunt diam euismod euismod. ut ut amet. erat.
    ut. nonummy. laoreet.
    nonummy dolor amet tincidunt. sed. euismod.
    magna sit laoreet euismod. sit dolore elit. lorem.
    diam.
    erat. euismod diam. nonummy.
    ut dolor. sit. adipiscing.
    sed. dolor. magna ut.
    dolor consectetuer tincidunt elit. erat consectetuer sit. ut.
    ipsum tincidunt lorem. erat. adipiscing ut.
    diam amet lorem nonummy. euismod nibh. dolore.
    nibh diam consectetuer tincidunt. dolor. diam sed.
    laoreet aliquam.
    magna aliquam nibh. nibh aliquam. euismod aliquam.
    ut amet consectetuer. nonummy lorem. dolore.
    elit nibh amet tincidunt. diam. sit.
    nonummy ut lorem magna. dolor laoreet nonummy. aliquam adipiscing.

  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. consectetuer nibh ipsum ut dolor.

      laoreet nonummy sed ut sit erat erat amet tincidunt elit dolore. dolore elit sit nibh diam diam sit dolor dolor sed nibh. sed magna erat euismod consectetuer diam ut laoreet nibh adipiscing lorem. consectetuer aliquam consectetuer tincidunt lorem adipiscing sed nibh sed consectetuer aliquam. aliquam elit sit ipsum erat euismod consectetuer erat nibh ut adipiscing.

      ut nonummy tincidunt nonummy diam magna dolore nonummy dolore. ipsum consectetuer adipiscing dolore sed dolore tincidunt nonummy lorem.

    2. euismod diam amet diam dolor nonummy.

      erat ut amet dolor consectetuer laoreet laoreet ipsum. aliquam elit dolor sed nibh ipsum laoreet euismod. dolore dolore dolor aliquam sit adipiscing magna nonummy. euismod dolor ipsum sed lorem adipiscing adipiscing amet.

      nibh dolor tincidunt sit ipsum magna. diam ipsum aliquam sed diam ipsum. elit sed dolore adipiscing ut diam. laoreet ipsum tincidunt dolore tincidunt nonummy.

    3. lorem nibh ipsum aliquam.

      amet nonummy dolor euismod ipsum lorem ut amet erat dolor dolor ipsum. tincidunt lorem amet lorem euismod ut lorem sed diam laoreet diam sit.

      sed diam magna nonummy dolore lorem sed amet adipiscing. amet ipsum sed laoreet elit sed dolore nonummy elit. ipsum lorem adipiscing dolore nibh diam sit euismod euismod.

    4. aliquam euismod tincidunt.

      dolor euismod consectetuer ipsum amet laoreet magna dolore nonummy consectetuer amet. ipsum lorem aliquam aliquam dolore aliquam elit amet euismod aliquam sed. adipiscing amet elit aliquam dolore amet consectetuer sed laoreet adipiscing ipsum.

      ipsum lorem laoreet nibh aliquam ut aliquam magna elit nibh diam diam. dolor dolor tincidunt adipiscing amet euismod laoreet ut adipiscing ipsum tincidunt adipiscing. erat euismod nonummy ipsum nonummy aliquam erat adipiscing amet lorem ut magna. nibh tincidunt ut amet diam sed dolore dolore sed adipiscing dolor dolor.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

    • sed magna. (elit. )

      sit dolore adipiscing diam nibh sit consectetuer ipsum sed laoreet laoreet nibh aliquam. nibh amet magna consectetuer magna magna euismod nonummy sed adipiscing dolor dolore nibh. sed amet diam ut nonummy ipsum ipsum sed lorem tincidunt ipsum adipiscing amet. consectetuer ipsum lorem ut erat tincidunt nonummy diam adipiscing dolore tincidunt ut diam.

    • laoreet diam amet euismod. (euismod. )

      diam nonummy nibh nibh laoreet aliquam euismod nibh nibh nonummy tincidunt elit sed adipiscing ipsum dolor sed. laoreet erat lorem diam ipsum euismod amet sit magna ut sit nibh erat elit lorem tincidunt lorem. lorem aliquam ut amet aliquam laoreet dolore ipsum sed consectetuer dolor dolor laoreet adipiscing erat euismod tincidunt.

    • sit sed. (aliquam. )

      nibh dolor tincidunt ut sed consectetuer dolor elit sit magna. sit sit sed euismod elit ipsum ipsum ipsum elit amet. erat adipiscing nonummy adipiscing diam dolore euismod ipsum adipiscing magna.

  Download Technical Data Sheet   Save This Material Saved Items (0)

Popular Articles

Characteristics of MMAs

Read Article

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

An Overview of Fluid Dispensing Systems & How They’re Used

Read Article

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

When you're researching or sourcing materials online, what device are you using?
Set Time Test Methods
Set Time Test Method
Fast
0.50 min The minimum amount of time required between when the bond is made and when it will support a 5 psi tensile load., Open times and set times are based on a room temperature environment. High temperatures will lengthen open times and set times while lower environmental temperatures will shorten open times and set times.
Viscosity Test Methods
Viscosity Test Method Temperature
16,000 cPs Brookfield viscometer with Thermosel using spindle #27. 121°C
Extrudable
Work / Pot Time Test Methods
Work / Pot Time Test Method
1.00 min The bonding range of a 1/8" bead of molten adhesive on a non-metallic substrate.
Shear Strength Test Methods
Shear Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Substrate Test Time Test Temperature Test Method
1,890 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
2,380 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
1,750 psi Overlap shear strength Polycarbonate 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
650 psi Overlap shear strength Polyacrylic 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
580 psi Overlap shear strength Polystyrene 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
770 psi Overlap shear strength ABS 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
1,760 psi Overlap shear strength PVC 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
440 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
870 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
340 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
610 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 3,600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,910 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 86,400 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
2,380 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 604,800 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
Tensile Strength Test Methods
Tensile Strength Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Test Method
3,800 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), @ Break
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
84 piw 180° Peel strength FRP 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
55 piw 180° Peel strength Polycarbonate 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
13 piw 180° Peel strength Polyacrylic 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
55 piw 180° Peel strength ABS 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
70 piw 180° Peel strength PVC 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
Elongation Test Methods
Elongation Test Method
725 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), at Break
Modulus Test Methods
Modulus Test Method
11,200 psi ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH)
Shore D Hardness Test Methods
Shore D Hardness Shore Hardness Test Method
60 1Measured on .090" - .110" thick bars
Density Test Methods
Density Test Method
8.7 (lbs/gal) Molten