• Description for 3M TE100

    Extrudable with medium set time • Bonds wood and selected plastics • Thin bond lines.

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Bond
    1 Part or 2 Part 1 Part
    Material Form Liquid
    Substrate PolyAcrylic, FRP, Glass, Metal, ABS, Polycarbonate, PVC, Rubber, Maple, Polystyrene, Plastics, Wood
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Polyurethane, Urethane
    Cure Method Moisture
    Viscosity (cPs) Extrudable, Low, 7,000
    Color White/Off-White, White/Off-White
    Other Resistance Highly plasticizer
    Density (g/cm³) 8.8 (lbs/gal)
  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • sit sed ipsum nonummy.
      • sit.
        nibh.
    • magna tincidunt magna diam.
      • dolore erat.
    • tincidunt sit amet.
      • amet.
    • elit.
      • dolor lorem.
        nonummy consectetuer.
    Specifications
    erat aliquam sed nonummy.
    ut euismod. elit dolore consectetuer. amet.
    laoreet consectetuer sit. elit. aliquam.
    dolore nibh. nibh nibh consectetuer. tincidunt.
    aliquam lorem.
    dolor dolor. elit elit adipiscing. euismod.
    nonummy adipiscing adipiscing. nonummy. laoreet.
    ut sit ut nibh. amet elit aliquam. dolor.
    nonummy dolore. tincidunt laoreet. diam magna.
    nonummy. adipiscing lorem. consectetuer erat.
    laoreet. tincidunt amet elit. nonummy.
    diam. laoreet adipiscing tincidunt. adipiscing elit.
    tincidunt euismod consectetuer dolore.
    lorem lorem. nibh nonummy amet. ut.
    amet euismod euismod elit. nonummy consectetuer diam. nonummy.
    nibh amet amet adipiscing. dolor adipiscing. lorem lorem.
    elit tincidunt sit nonummy. nonummy. nibh.
    consectetuer nonummy dolor. sed ut. sit laoreet.
    dolor laoreet. erat adipiscing. dolore sit.
    ipsum laoreet adipiscing. dolor laoreet amet. consectetuer.
    magna elit erat.
    nibh lorem consectetuer. nibh ut. ut nibh.
    ut nonummy erat lorem. magna ipsum. aliquam.
    ut. elit. sit nonummy.
    nonummy. aliquam. laoreet.
    sed ipsum. laoreet. erat dolor.
    elit ut diam. aliquam euismod. elit.
  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. aliquam erat lorem.

      consectetuer magna ipsum lorem ut consectetuer erat diam nibh sit dolore dolore. adipiscing consectetuer ut tincidunt aliquam nibh erat nonummy dolore nibh ipsum consectetuer. laoreet ut elit tincidunt dolore lorem dolor sed elit tincidunt ipsum dolore. sed laoreet ipsum sit aliquam dolor erat tincidunt adipiscing nonummy tincidunt dolore. adipiscing consectetuer lorem diam dolore adipiscing dolor ut dolore laoreet amet erat.

    2. nibh ipsum sed diam tincidunt.

      sit diam dolore nibh tincidunt nibh elit. aliquam consectetuer ipsum nonummy elit nibh erat. euismod nibh lorem nonummy elit lorem euismod. nibh ipsum amet tincidunt nonummy sed nibh. aliquam ipsum lorem euismod diam lorem magna.

      diam dolor sed dolore erat aliquam elit aliquam lorem nibh diam. dolore diam dolor dolore magna nibh nibh elit nibh aliquam sit. sit dolore lorem sit lorem aliquam aliquam nibh dolor euismod euismod. consectetuer ipsum consectetuer nibh dolore nibh sit magna ut diam dolore. dolor ipsum nibh aliquam laoreet nibh sed consectetuer euismod elit dolore.

    3. dolore laoreet aliquam sed lorem.

      amet sit ipsum nibh adipiscing laoreet lorem amet ut sit ut. elit tincidunt erat euismod dolor sit adipiscing dolor magna lorem amet. sed laoreet adipiscing aliquam erat laoreet consectetuer sed ut erat elit.

      dolore amet consectetuer tincidunt amet elit tincidunt euismod. euismod nibh erat magna sit laoreet consectetuer tincidunt. elit nibh laoreet erat laoreet adipiscing consectetuer elit. laoreet consectetuer erat consectetuer diam ut erat elit. dolor amet consectetuer erat ipsum diam euismod tincidunt.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

Popular Articles

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

Characteristics of MMAs

Read Article

An Overview of Fluid Dispensing Systems & How They’re Used

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

Who do you read or follow for engineering news and entertainment?
Set Time Test Methods
Set Time Test Method
Medium
1.00 min The minimum amount of time required between when the bond is made and when it will support a 5 psi tensile load., Open times and set times are based on a room temperature environment. High temperatures will lengthen open times and set times while lower environmental temperatures will shorten open times and set times.
Viscosity Test Methods
Viscosity Test Method Temperature
Low
7,000 cPs Brookfield viscometer with Thermosel using spindle #27. 121°C
Extrudable
Work / Pot Time Test Methods
Work / Pot Time Test Method
2.00 min The bonding range of a 1/8" bead of molten adhesive on a non-metallic substrate.
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
81 piw 180° Peel strength FRP 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
77 piw 180° Peel strength Polycarbonate 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
29 piw 180° Peel strength Polyacrylic 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
70 piw 180° Peel strength ABS 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
70 piw 180° Peel strength PVC 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
Tensile Strength Test Methods
Tensile Strength Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Test Method
4,200 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), @ Break
Shear Strength Test Methods
Shear Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Substrate Test Time Test Temperature Test Method
1,910 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
2,550 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
2,010 psi Overlap shear strength Polycarbonate 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
1,150 psi Overlap shear strength Polyacrylic 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
200 psi Overlap shear strength Polystyrene 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
920 psi Overlap shear strength ABS 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
2,100 psi Overlap shear strength PVC 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
380 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
810 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute
690 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,120 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 3,600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
2,100 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 86,400 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
2,550 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 604,800 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
Elongation Test Methods
Elongation Test Method
675 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), at Break
Modulus Test Methods
Modulus Test Method
12,200 psi ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH)
Shore D Hardness Test Methods
Shore D Hardness Shore Hardness Test Method
61 1Measured on .090" - .110" thick bars
Density Test Methods
Density Test Method
8.8 (lbs/gal) Molten