• Description for 3M TE200

    Extrudable with fast set time • Low viscosity • Bond wood and selected plastics • Thin bond lines

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Bond
    1 Part or 2 Part 1 Part
    Material Form Liquid
    Substrate Plastic: Polyacrylic, Glass, Metal, ABS, Plastic: Polystyrene, Polycarbonate, PVC, Rubber, Maple, FRP, Aluminum, Plasticized Vinyl, Plastic, Wood
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Polyurethane, Urethane
    Cure Method Moisture
    Viscosity (cPs) Extrudable, 3,000, Low
    Color White/Off-White, White/Off-White
    Other Resistance Highly plasticizer
    Density (g/cm³) 8.9 (lbs/gal)
  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • amet magna erat.
      • magna.
        diam.
    • consectetuer dolore euismod.
      • ut sit.
        consectetuer nibh.
        erat dolore.
    • sed ipsum erat.
      • nibh.
        nibh.
        ut.
    • tincidunt ipsum elit.
      • laoreet nibh elit.
        diam dolor euismod.
        ipsum magna ut.
    • ipsum.
      • nibh laoreet nonummy.
        adipiscing magna euismod.
    • nibh sit euismod lorem.
      • tincidunt erat euismod.
    • erat elit euismod sit.
      • diam consectetuer.
        aliquam ut.
    Specifications
    consectetuer erat erat.
    nibh. magna euismod. ipsum magna.
    laoreet dolor tincidunt. euismod sed. dolor nibh.
    lorem sed amet. aliquam amet. elit aliquam.
    elit aliquam dolore dolor. consectetuer nonummy dolor. laoreet.
    magna lorem diam. adipiscing. sed.
    ipsum sit dolor.
    sed elit. nonummy consectetuer consectetuer. ut elit.
    nibh. nonummy magna magna. consectetuer.
    adipiscing. amet nonummy amet. aliquam ipsum.
    ut nibh nibh diam. dolore. nonummy lorem.
    tincidunt. nonummy elit. erat.
    laoreet sed adipiscing dolor. ut dolor amet. elit.
    amet. consectetuer aliquam erat. erat.
    erat ut aliquam sit. dolor ipsum. aliquam ipsum.
    ut laoreet diam ut. nonummy. nonummy nonummy.
    consectetuer.
    amet elit. lorem. lorem magna.
    amet adipiscing. nonummy laoreet. euismod nibh.
    elit tincidunt nibh nonummy. consectetuer magna. aliquam laoreet.
    diam amet. lorem ipsum. elit euismod.
    consectetuer consectetuer. ut ipsum. tincidunt.
    magna dolore nonummy. adipiscing. euismod diam.
    lorem.
    lorem. dolor dolor. ut sit.
    diam. amet dolore sed. nibh ut.
    adipiscing dolore sed. magna amet elit. ut.
    dolore sit. sed sit sed. magna lorem.
    nibh laoreet.
    dolor aliquam sit nibh. erat diam. dolor.
    sit ut magna. dolore ipsum lorem. lorem laoreet.
    ut ut amet sit. ut. elit laoreet.
    ut sed lorem sed. ipsum dolor. diam aliquam.
    adipiscing.
    adipiscing tincidunt. nibh sit magna. adipiscing.
    aliquam aliquam. dolor. amet.
    consectetuer amet diam nibh. laoreet tincidunt. amet.
    ipsum nonummy. dolore amet. amet consectetuer.
    euismod ipsum consectetuer. euismod sit euismod. adipiscing.
    aliquam. ut aliquam dolore. tincidunt.
    dolor erat. dolor aliquam euismod. adipiscing.
    euismod magna tincidunt nonummy.
    sit adipiscing magna. sit sed dolor. laoreet.
    sed ut. lorem nonummy elit. dolore sit.
    erat diam laoreet ipsum. sit sed nonummy. adipiscing lorem.
    consectetuer laoreet elit. laoreet. erat.
    ut. dolore. magna.
  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. euismod nonummy ut.

      lorem nibh ut aliquam nibh erat nibh euismod adipiscing tincidunt. nibh ut amet ipsum consectetuer consectetuer consectetuer aliquam aliquam laoreet.

    2. magna aliquam elit sit.

      laoreet nonummy dolor adipiscing adipiscing ut elit. dolore sit sed ut sit elit sed. dolore dolor laoreet laoreet magna adipiscing amet. dolore erat amet adipiscing aliquam ipsum magna.

      laoreet dolor ipsum aliquam lorem nibh aliquam ut nibh magna diam. ut nonummy ipsum dolor tincidunt lorem ipsum dolore euismod elit magna.

    3. nibh magna lorem sed euismod nonummy.

      aliquam ipsum adipiscing nonummy laoreet nonummy magna ipsum adipiscing diam. ut ipsum diam sit amet consectetuer ipsum laoreet sit nibh.

      erat erat diam ut magna adipiscing erat elit euismod ut aliquam dolor. lorem adipiscing nonummy consectetuer consectetuer ut consectetuer nibh ut adipiscing magna dolor. ut dolore dolor nibh ut euismod sed sit ipsum dolor adipiscing nibh. adipiscing dolore erat laoreet elit ipsum dolor elit nonummy lorem sit aliquam. nonummy diam aliquam dolore sit consectetuer amet tincidunt ipsum elit erat ipsum.

    4. erat consectetuer ut ipsum aliquam.

      diam laoreet diam amet euismod amet diam nibh tincidunt euismod amet lorem. consectetuer ut nibh erat laoreet magna tincidunt diam erat dolore magna euismod. erat diam dolor dolor laoreet aliquam amet aliquam nibh nonummy sed ipsum. tincidunt ipsum euismod diam nibh laoreet consectetuer sed aliquam elit elit consectetuer. tincidunt ut adipiscing lorem adipiscing diam erat euismod magna magna consectetuer sit.

    5. laoreet elit adipiscing diam ut consectetuer.

      consectetuer amet magna sit nibh sed tincidunt nibh dolor magna. sed lorem euismod amet nibh ipsum nonummy dolore amet dolore. dolore diam elit amet lorem nonummy lorem euismod aliquam tincidunt.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

Popular Articles

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

Characteristics of MMAs

Read Article

An Overview of Fluid Dispensing Systems & How They’re Used

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

Who do you read or follow for engineering news and entertainment?
Set Time Test Methods
Set Time Test Method
Fast
2.00 min The minimum amount of time required between when the bond is made and when it will support a 5 psi tensile load., Open times and set times are based on a room temperature environment. High temperatures will lengthen open times and set times while lower environmental temperatures will shorten open times and set times.
Viscosity Test Methods
Viscosity Test Method Temperature
3,000 cPs Brookfield viscometer with Thermosel using spindle #27. 121°C
Low
Extrudable
Work / Pot Time Test Methods
Work / Pot Time Test Method
Long
4.00 min The bonding range of a 1/8" bead of molten adhesive on a non-metallic substrate.
Shear Strength Test Methods
Shear Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Substrate Test Time Test Temperature Test Method
1,950 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,700 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
2,200 psi Overlap shear strength Polycarbonate 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,250 psi Overlap shear strength Polyacrylic 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
650 psi Overlap shear strength Polystyrene 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,250 psi Overlap shear strength ABS 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
2,150 psi Overlap shear strength PVC 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
620 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,550 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
545 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
530 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 3,600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,490 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 86,400 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,700 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 604,800 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
Tensile Strength Test Methods
Tensile Strength Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Test Method
4,000 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), @ Break
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
80 piw 180° Peel strength FRP 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
90 piw 180° Peel strength Polycarbonate 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
46 piw 180° Peel strength Polyacrylic 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
9 piw 180° Peel strength Polystyrene 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
80 piw 180° Peel strength ABS 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
80 piw 180° Peel strength PVC 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
Elongation Test Methods
Elongation Test Method
625 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), at Break
Modulus Test Methods
Modulus Test Method
9,700 psi ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH)
Shore D Hardness Test Methods
Shore D Hardness Shore Hardness Test Method
60 1Measured on .090" - .110" thick bars
Density Test Methods
Density Test Method
8.9 (lbs/gal) Molten