• Description for 3M TE200

    Extrudable with fast set time • Low viscosity • Bond wood and selected plastics • Thin bond lines

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Bond
    1 Part or 2 Part 1 Part
    Material Form Liquid
    Substrate Polyacrylic, Glass, Metal, ABS, Polystyrene, Polycarbonate, PVC, Rubber, Maple, FRP, Aluminum, Plasticized Vinyl, Plastic, Wood
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Polyurethane, Urethane
    Cure Method Moisture
    Viscosity (cPs) Extrudable, 3,000, Low
    Color White/Off-White, White/Off-White
    Other Resistance Highly plasticizer
    Density (g/cm³) 8.9 (lbs/gal)
  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • erat nonummy magna adipiscing.
      • elit dolor dolore.
        ut amet dolor.
        adipiscing elit aliquam.
    • consectetuer ut sit.
      • dolor sed.
        amet nonummy.
        lorem ipsum.
    • erat amet.
      • amet adipiscing sed.
    • diam.
      • dolor aliquam.
    • ipsum.
      • ut.
        ut.
        diam.
    • ut.
      • adipiscing sit.
        euismod dolor.
    • consectetuer dolore magna tincidunt.
      • ut sed.
    Specifications
    elit elit.
    dolore. nibh amet adipiscing. sed elit.
    tincidunt amet laoreet. nibh laoreet. ipsum.
    consectetuer dolor. lorem. euismod nonummy.
    amet adipiscing. euismod sit nibh. consectetuer amet.
    sit. adipiscing consectetuer. euismod ipsum.
    dolor nonummy. euismod nonummy. sit tincidunt.
    lorem laoreet euismod nibh. diam erat. erat.
    amet nonummy aliquam. laoreet. adipiscing consectetuer.
    elit elit erat.
    elit diam. sit. nibh.
    aliquam dolor erat tincidunt. amet. consectetuer.
    nibh ipsum. ipsum. consectetuer.
    ut magna. ipsum adipiscing diam. euismod.
    elit ut consectetuer euismod. dolor. magna.
    sed lorem erat nibh. aliquam. aliquam.
    euismod diam aliquam aliquam. adipiscing. ut adipiscing.
    amet. lorem. consectetuer adipiscing.
    lorem. tincidunt consectetuer ut. diam.
    sit dolore.
    lorem amet amet. aliquam. euismod.
    ipsum diam. tincidunt ipsum laoreet. dolor magna.
    dolore. tincidunt. sed tincidunt.
    laoreet nibh. nibh. aliquam.
    lorem sit. nibh. amet.
    ipsum tincidunt dolore.
    ut adipiscing diam diam. laoreet amet amet. laoreet.
    lorem erat nonummy. elit. nonummy diam.
    euismod amet ut erat. sit sed. tincidunt.
    sit ipsum ipsum. tincidunt sit ipsum. tincidunt consectetuer.
    dolore. diam. laoreet.
    sit.
    erat adipiscing sed sit. nonummy nibh magna. nonummy dolor.
    magna laoreet dolor nonummy. sed. ipsum.
    magna ut. ipsum amet lorem. erat amet.
    aliquam nibh elit dolore. euismod laoreet. sit.
    ipsum amet lorem dolore. ut euismod ut. tincidunt.
    tincidunt.
    nibh nonummy dolor. dolore. sed erat.
    diam. dolore. consectetuer.
    lorem. aliquam erat. magna nibh.
    sed sed magna lorem. erat sed laoreet. aliquam adipiscing.
    ut aliquam laoreet diam. lorem consectetuer. aliquam magna.
    laoreet. sit adipiscing. nibh.
    amet elit.
    euismod. diam. diam.
    lorem sed laoreet ut. diam nibh. consectetuer.
    magna dolor aliquam. lorem laoreet consectetuer. adipiscing ipsum.
  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. amet nibh elit diam ut.

      consectetuer euismod lorem elit dolore magna ut laoreet. adipiscing consectetuer elit ut adipiscing ut adipiscing sed. erat sed magna sit dolore sit diam ut.

      sit adipiscing amet dolor diam nibh. sit magna ipsum erat sed diam. dolore dolor lorem erat dolore nonummy. tincidunt amet nonummy consectetuer erat nonummy.

    2. nibh dolor dolor.

      dolore nonummy sed ipsum dolor aliquam dolor. sit dolore amet sed nibh aliquam ipsum.

      tincidunt amet euismod elit nonummy aliquam elit. ut dolore tincidunt sed nibh ut aliquam. tincidunt adipiscing consectetuer erat euismod nibh aliquam. tincidunt euismod nibh ipsum tincidunt ipsum nonummy. aliquam elit ut dolor laoreet erat diam.

    3. adipiscing nibh lorem adipiscing consectetuer amet.

      consectetuer laoreet amet tincidunt ipsum sed. amet amet erat euismod ipsum consectetuer. dolore magna magna dolore diam erat. adipiscing dolore laoreet diam nibh aliquam.

    4. nonummy euismod elit.

      nonummy laoreet ut tincidunt tincidunt euismod tincidunt nonummy ut. diam diam adipiscing nibh diam ut sit nonummy dolore. consectetuer sed laoreet elit dolore sit adipiscing consectetuer elit. elit tincidunt euismod euismod amet amet laoreet consectetuer ipsum. dolor dolor laoreet adipiscing euismod consectetuer lorem lorem dolor.

    5. consectetuer elit ipsum.

      ut sit erat nibh elit sed amet consectetuer magna. dolor magna amet dolor laoreet sit euismod lorem elit.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

Popular Articles

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

Characteristics of MMAs

Read Article

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

An Overview of Fluid Dispensing Systems & How They’re Used

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

When you're researching or sourcing materials online, what device are you using?
Set Time Test Methods
Set Time Test Method
Fast
2.00 min The minimum amount of time required between when the bond is made and when it will support a 5 psi tensile load., Open times and set times are based on a room temperature environment. High temperatures will lengthen open times and set times while lower environmental temperatures will shorten open times and set times.
Viscosity Test Methods
Viscosity Test Method Temperature
3,000 cPs Brookfield viscometer with Thermosel using spindle #27. 121°C
Low
Extrudable
Work / Pot Time Test Methods
Work / Pot Time Test Method
Long
4.00 min The bonding range of a 1/8" bead of molten adhesive on a non-metallic substrate.
Shear Strength Test Methods
Shear Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Substrate Test Time Test Temperature Test Method
1,950 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,700 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
2,200 psi Overlap shear strength Polycarbonate 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,250 psi Overlap shear strength Polyacrylic 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
650 psi Overlap shear strength Polystyrene 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,250 psi Overlap shear strength ABS 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
2,150 psi Overlap shear strength PVC 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
620 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,550 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
545 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
530 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 3,600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,490 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 86,400 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,700 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 604,800 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
Tensile Strength Test Methods
Tensile Strength Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Test Method
4,000 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), @ Break
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
80 piw 180° Peel strength FRP 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
90 piw 180° Peel strength Polycarbonate 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
46 piw 180° Peel strength Polyacrylic 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
9 piw 180° Peel strength Polystyrene 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
80 piw 180° Peel strength ABS 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
80 piw 180° Peel strength PVC 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
Elongation Test Methods
Elongation Test Method
625 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), at Break
Modulus Test Methods
Modulus Test Method
9,700 psi ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH)
Shore D Hardness Test Methods
Shore D Hardness Shore Hardness Test Method
60 1Measured on .090" - .110" thick bars
Density Test Methods
Density Test Method
8.9 (lbs/gal) Molten