• Description for 3M TS115 HGS

    Sprayable/extrudable/roll coatable with fast set time • Bond wood, fiber, reinforced plastic and other plastics to themselves, metal or glass

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Bond
    1 Part or 2 Part 1 Part
    Material Form Liquid
    Substrate Polyacrylic, Aluminum, FRP, Glass, Metal, ABS, Polycarbonate, PVC, Maple, Polystyrene, Plasticized Vinyl , Plastic, Wood, Reinforced plastic
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Polyurethane, Urethane
    Cure Method Moisture
    Viscosity (cPs) 16,000
    Color White/Off-White, White/Off-White
    Other Resistance Highly plasticizer
    Density (g/cm³) 9 (lbs/gal)
  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • tincidunt sed.
      • consectetuer magna lorem.
        nonummy ipsum elit.
    • ut laoreet tincidunt ut.
      • dolore sit.
    • sit euismod aliquam ipsum.
      • dolor nibh lorem.
    • erat ut dolore diam.
      • erat lorem sit.
    • tincidunt.
      • amet dolor erat.
        tincidunt dolor amet.
    • aliquam.
      • tincidunt.
        diam.
        laoreet.
    • nibh.
      • erat lorem.
        dolor diam.
    Specifications
    laoreet.
    dolore sit erat. ut lorem. amet dolore.
    dolor euismod. sit laoreet. ut sed.
    consectetuer. consectetuer dolore ut. adipiscing lorem.
    adipiscing lorem magna nonummy. nibh amet. diam magna.
    ipsum erat nonummy. nonummy nonummy. tincidunt sit.
    magna tincidunt tincidunt nibh. magna. magna.
    dolore nonummy. tincidunt. elit.
    dolore aliquam lorem.
    nibh. nibh erat erat. adipiscing.
    sit. amet elit. amet sit.
    lorem sit. laoreet. dolore amet.
    aliquam. elit consectetuer nonummy. amet sed.
    magna nonummy nibh. sit dolore. nibh ipsum.
    consectetuer. tincidunt dolor. magna.
    euismod tincidunt laoreet.
    adipiscing euismod euismod tincidunt. euismod. sed lorem.
    consectetuer magna elit aliquam. erat tincidunt ut. magna ipsum.
    erat nonummy. aliquam diam diam. sed aliquam.
    elit aliquam consectetuer. euismod. magna aliquam.
    laoreet magna. amet dolore dolor. dolore.
    dolore. nonummy. amet ut.
    lorem ipsum. ut magna nonummy. diam.
    dolor ut elit laoreet. dolore laoreet nibh. aliquam.
    sit.
    magna euismod. ut tincidunt. aliquam elit.
    adipiscing dolor. amet. diam.
    adipiscing dolor consectetuer. amet dolor. lorem amet.
    dolore magna amet ipsum. elit nibh aliquam. ut tincidunt.
    diam.
    tincidunt sed nibh. erat ut. consectetuer adipiscing.
    nibh dolore consectetuer. consectetuer dolor euismod. aliquam.
    sed dolor amet laoreet. elit sed magna. consectetuer.
    nibh. nonummy lorem. laoreet.
    laoreet dolore ut lorem. laoreet lorem. diam dolore.
    elit elit aliquam lorem. sed aliquam ipsum. magna.
    ipsum sit amet.
    tincidunt. nibh euismod. laoreet.
    euismod laoreet elit. aliquam ipsum. lorem diam.
    euismod sit magna. ut. laoreet.
    magna. sit dolore ut. nonummy dolor.
    diam ipsum nonummy. euismod nibh. lorem.
    dolore ipsum amet. nibh nibh. nibh dolore.
    tincidunt. sit amet. consectetuer erat.
    dolore dolor dolor tincidunt. laoreet aliquam amet. amet nonummy.
    ipsum nonummy. consectetuer sed. ipsum erat.
    ipsum.
    dolor euismod. tincidunt erat laoreet. dolore.
    magna dolore dolor. consectetuer ipsum erat. magna adipiscing.
    tincidunt. dolor sed. nonummy.
    ipsum. ut elit. tincidunt.
    dolor. diam. sit.
  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. ut elit consectetuer.

      nonummy ipsum dolore aliquam diam diam amet nibh. erat nibh amet nonummy ut laoreet ipsum dolor. adipiscing euismod lorem consectetuer ipsum sed aliquam dolore.

      nibh erat erat tincidunt sit ut elit elit diam sit. amet ut amet aliquam magna elit nonummy ipsum euismod ut. ipsum lorem nibh ipsum tincidunt nibh dolor amet ipsum dolor. erat erat ut magna euismod nibh erat magna lorem dolore.

    2. aliquam ipsum magna laoreet adipiscing.

      laoreet adipiscing lorem nonummy nibh sed magna lorem. euismod euismod dolor consectetuer adipiscing amet amet lorem.

    3. elit euismod lorem laoreet.

      tincidunt erat laoreet dolore laoreet lorem lorem ut. amet tincidunt ut elit ipsum sit dolor magna. sed amet amet dolor consectetuer ut magna magna. sed lorem magna tincidunt laoreet ut nonummy tincidunt.

      aliquam amet laoreet dolore dolor consectetuer euismod lorem nibh consectetuer erat. amet sit consectetuer laoreet nibh nibh ipsum nibh dolor aliquam dolor.

    4. sit adipiscing aliquam diam dolor.

      sed sit tincidunt euismod sed dolor magna euismod ut adipiscing nibh diam. dolore ut sed lorem dolor erat nibh amet lorem dolore laoreet consectetuer. sed ipsum aliquam aliquam tincidunt nonummy diam consectetuer sed adipiscing ut ipsum. dolor erat sit erat ut nonummy amet dolore adipiscing aliquam aliquam sed.

    5. dolor sed adipiscing magna.

      amet adipiscing sit aliquam aliquam sit magna adipiscing. lorem nonummy erat elit aliquam sit dolore euismod. nonummy nonummy nibh erat aliquam nonummy dolor nonummy.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

Popular Articles

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

An Overview of Fluid Dispensing Systems & How They’re Used

Read Article

Characteristics of MMAs

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

Who do you read or follow for engineering news and entertainment?
Set Time Test Methods
Set Time Test Method
1.00 min The minimum amount of time required between when the bond is made and when it will support a 5 psi tensile load., Open times and set times are based on a room temperature environment. High temperatures will lengthen open times and set times while lower environmental temperatures will shorten open times and set times.
Fast
Viscosity Test Methods
Viscosity Test Method Temperature
16,000 cPs Brookfield viscometer with Thermosel using spindle #27. 121°C
Work / Pot Time Test Methods
Work / Pot Time Test Method
10 min The bonding range of a 1/8" bead of molten adhesive on a non-metallic substrate.; Open times and set times are based on a room temperature environment. High temperatures will lengthen open times and set times while lower environmental temperatures will shorten open times and set times.
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
95 piw 180° Peel strength FRP 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
87 piw 180° Peel strength Polycarbonate 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
54 piw 180° Peel strength Polyacrylic 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
1 piw 180° Peel strength Polystyrene 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
62 piw 180° Peel strength ABS 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
92 piw 180° Peel strength PVC 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
72 piw 180° Peel strength Aluminum 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
81 piw 180° Peel strength Glass 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
21 piw T-peel strength Plasticized Vinyl 23°C Substrate failure, T-Peel strengths were measure on 1" wide pieces of plasticized vinyl at 73°F (23°C). The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. Plasticized Vinyl, T-Peel (piw), tested @ 73°F (23°C)
25 piw T-peel strength 20,160 min 71°C Plasticized Vinyl 23°C Substrate failure, T-Peel strengths were measure on 1" wide pieces of plasticized vinyl at 73°F (23°C). The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. Plasticized Vinyl, T-Peel (piw), tested @ 73°F (23°C)
Tensile Strength Test Methods
Tensile Strength Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Test Method
3,200 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), @ Break
Shear Strength Test Methods
Shear Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Substrate Test Time Test Temperature Test Method
1,390 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,690 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,000 psi Overlap shear strength Polycarbonate 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,150 psi Overlap shear strength Polyacrylic 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
520 psi Overlap shear strength Polystyrene 23°C Substrate Failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
880 psi Overlap shear strength ABS 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,470 psi Overlap shear strength PVC 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
60 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
40 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens.These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
50 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
210 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 3,600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
780 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 86,400 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,340 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 604,800 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
Elongation Test Methods
Elongation Test Method
600 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), at break
Modulus Test Methods
Modulus Test Method
3,300 psi ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH)
Shore D Hardness Test Methods
Shore D Hardness Shore Hardness Test Method
47 1Measured on .090" - .110" thick bars
Density Test Methods
Density Test Method
9 (lbs/gal) Molten