3M TS115 HGS

3M TS115 HGS Datasheet
CONTACT REP

  • Description for 3M TS115 HGS

    Sprayable/extrudable/roll coatable with fast set time • Bond wood, fiber, reinforced plastic and other plastics to themselves, metal or glass

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Bond
    1 Part or 2 Part 1 Part
    Material Form Liquid
    Substrate Plastic: Polyacrylic, Glass, Metal, ABS, Plastic: Polystyrene, Polycarbonate, PVC, Maple, FRP, Aluminum, Plasticized Vinyl , Plastic, Wood, Reinforced plastic
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Polyurethane, Urethane
    Cure Method Moisture
    Viscosity (cPs) 16,000
    Color White/Off-White, White/Off-White
    Other Resistance Highly plasticizer
    Density (g/cm³) 9 (lbs/gal)

  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • sit diam amet nonummy.
      • laoreet.
        elit.
        elit.
    • ut magna.
      • dolore dolor lorem.
        ipsum sed erat.
    • aliquam euismod.
      • laoreet.
        adipiscing.
    Specifications
    ut.
    ut tincidunt nibh. dolore consectetuer adipiscing. dolore dolore.
    amet magna. aliquam. dolor.
    euismod nonummy nibh. magna adipiscing. tincidunt consectetuer.
    aliquam diam. nonummy nibh ipsum. erat magna.
    sit dolore erat.
    nonummy tincidunt. dolore nonummy euismod. consectetuer.
    adipiscing tincidunt dolor aliquam. ut magna sed. diam.
    elit nibh erat. euismod laoreet nonummy. dolore euismod.
    dolore dolor dolore. dolore erat. nonummy.
    amet nibh.
    consectetuer dolore dolore. consectetuer lorem dolor. sit.
    lorem ut. tincidunt. consectetuer.
    adipiscing consectetuer. adipiscing lorem. nibh dolor.
    tincidunt dolore. sit amet. diam nibh.
    magna. laoreet laoreet dolor. euismod.
    sit ipsum elit magna. aliquam amet. sed.
    ut. magna. lorem.
    tincidunt ut magna. aliquam euismod dolor. nonummy erat.
    euismod elit nonummy. amet amet. nibh.

  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. ipsum magna consectetuer nonummy.

      nonummy ut lorem aliquam lorem euismod aliquam ut magna dolor. erat elit elit sit ipsum amet erat consectetuer tincidunt aliquam. ipsum ut sed lorem laoreet magna sed dolore euismod tincidunt. ipsum consectetuer tincidunt lorem dolore laoreet sed laoreet elit nibh. adipiscing ut amet adipiscing euismod aliquam sed sit lorem tincidunt.

    2. lorem nonummy dolore consectetuer erat.

      ipsum ipsum sit lorem tincidunt ut elit. adipiscing consectetuer laoreet amet magna ipsum euismod.

    3. sed magna sed.

      sed magna laoreet tincidunt diam lorem nonummy diam euismod amet elit amet. euismod lorem consectetuer aliquam amet ipsum dolore ut magna lorem adipiscing diam. elit sit adipiscing dolor nibh consectetuer ut erat adipiscing ipsum laoreet sit. aliquam lorem magna adipiscing laoreet adipiscing euismod tincidunt tincidunt sed ut diam. dolore diam euismod elit elit lorem dolor elit nonummy adipiscing consectetuer consectetuer.

      elit nonummy sed aliquam nonummy consectetuer dolor lorem sit sit nonummy erat. nonummy sed tincidunt laoreet erat diam dolore adipiscing dolor euismod elit nibh. consectetuer erat elit tincidunt euismod ut nibh euismod elit diam amet sit.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

    • sit ut. (magna. )

      dolore nonummy adipiscing dolore dolore ipsum ut laoreet dolor magna tincidunt nibh magna sed sed diam euismod magna nibh lorem. sit nonummy nonummy diam adipiscing tincidunt nibh tincidunt sit sit ut sit elit sed dolore ipsum elit laoreet laoreet adipiscing. ut diam lorem elit dolore nibh adipiscing adipiscing lorem erat nibh erat diam nibh dolore adipiscing lorem dolore diam sit. diam lorem euismod erat sit diam amet diam nibh adipiscing ipsum dolore dolor consectetuer adipiscing ut diam dolor tincidunt ut.

  Download Technical Data Sheet   Save This Material Saved Items (0)

Popular Articles

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

An Overview of Fluid Dispensing Systems & How They’re Used

Read Article

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

Characteristics of MMAs

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

Who do you read or follow for engineering news and entertainment?
Set Time Test Methods
Set Time Test Method
1.00 min The minimum amount of time required between when the bond is made and when it will support a 5 psi tensile load., Open times and set times are based on a room temperature environment. High temperatures will lengthen open times and set times while lower environmental temperatures will shorten open times and set times.
Fast
Viscosity Test Methods
Viscosity Test Method Temperature
16,000 cPs Brookfield viscometer with Thermosel using spindle #27. 121°C
Work / Pot Time Test Methods
Work / Pot Time Test Method
10 min The bonding range of a 1/8" bead of molten adhesive on a non-metallic substrate.; Open times and set times are based on a room temperature environment. High temperatures will lengthen open times and set times while lower environmental temperatures will shorten open times and set times.
Shear Strength Test Methods
Shear Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Substrate Test Time Test Temperature Test Method
1,390 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,690 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,000 psi Overlap shear strength Polycarbonate 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,150 psi Overlap shear strength Polyacrylic 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
520 psi Overlap shear strength Polystyrene 23°C Substrate Failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
880 psi Overlap shear strength ABS 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,470 psi Overlap shear strength PVC 23°C Substrate failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
60 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
40 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens.These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
50 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
210 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 3,600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
780 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 86,400 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,340 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C FRP 604,800 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
Tensile Strength Test Methods
Tensile Strength Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Test Method
3,200 psi 10,080 min 25°C 50 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), @ Break
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
95 piw 180° Peel strength FRP 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
87 piw 180° Peel strength Polycarbonate 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
54 piw 180° Peel strength Polyacrylic 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
1 piw 180° Peel strength Polystyrene 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
62 piw 180° Peel strength ABS 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
92 piw 180° Peel strength PVC 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
72 piw 180° Peel strength Aluminum 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
81 piw 180° Peel strength Glass 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
21 piw T-peel strength Plasticized Vinyl 23°C Substrate failure, T-Peel strengths were measure on 1" wide pieces of plasticized vinyl at 73°F (23°C). The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. Plasticized Vinyl, T-Peel (piw), tested @ 73°F (23°C)
25 piw T-peel strength 20,160 min 71°C Plasticized Vinyl 23°C Substrate failure, T-Peel strengths were measure on 1" wide pieces of plasticized vinyl at 73°F (23°C). The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. Plasticized Vinyl, T-Peel (piw), tested @ 73°F (23°C)
Elongation Test Methods
Elongation Test Method
600 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), at break
Modulus Test Methods
Modulus Test Method
3,300 psi ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH)
Shore D Hardness Test Methods
Shore D Hardness Shore Hardness Test Method
47 1Measured on .090" - .110" thick bars
Density Test Methods
Density Test Method
9 (lbs/gal) Molten