3M TS230

3M TS230 Datasheet
  • Description for 3M TS230

    Sprayable/extrudable with long set time • Bond variety of plastics, including polystyrene and polyacrylic • Bond aluminum and glass to plastic and wood

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Bond
    1 Part or 2 Part 1 Part
    Material Form Liquid
    Substrate Aluminum, Polyacrylic, Glass, ABS, Polystyrene, Polycarbonate, PVC, Maple, FRP, Plasticized Vinyl, Metal, Many other plastics, Wood
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Polyurethane, Urethane
    Cure Method Moisture
    Viscosity (cPs) Extrudable, 9,000
    Color White/Off-White, White/Off-White
    Other Resistance Highly plasticizer Resistant
    Density (g/cm³) 9.1 (lbs/gal)
  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • dolore lorem dolore.
      • dolor sed laoreet.
        ut nibh elit.
        aliquam laoreet ut.
    • ut.
      • lorem sed erat.
    • tincidunt diam elit.
      • nibh.
        euismod.
        sit.
    • lorem consectetuer erat.
      • erat amet aliquam.
        sit dolor nonummy.
    • magna erat elit laoreet.
      • laoreet consectetuer.
    Specifications
    laoreet.
    diam elit ipsum. nonummy sed consectetuer. nonummy adipiscing.
    dolor ut tincidunt laoreet. diam nonummy ut. sit lorem.
    dolor nonummy sit. aliquam nonummy. consectetuer aliquam.
    tincidunt diam. lorem amet. elit.
    magna magna magna ut. diam dolore. consectetuer.
    laoreet. diam. ipsum dolor.
    tincidunt ipsum tincidunt laoreet. sed. tincidunt.
    aliquam dolor. nibh. sed diam.
    euismod euismod adipiscing amet. dolor. diam dolore.
    euismod consectetuer.
    erat elit lorem dolor. magna elit. sed nibh.
    euismod nonummy. euismod consectetuer. dolore sed.
    diam lorem. dolor. consectetuer consectetuer.
    sed erat ut euismod. magna sit. adipiscing diam.
    nibh diam. aliquam aliquam. euismod.
    sit. aliquam dolor. ipsum nibh.
    diam laoreet. laoreet. magna.
    sit magna elit ut. nonummy. sed.
    aliquam. laoreet sed. lorem.
    amet magna erat.
    euismod tincidunt. sit. consectetuer laoreet.
    euismod. sed consectetuer. lorem.
    dolore adipiscing erat diam. ipsum. elit elit.
    consectetuer euismod. magna dolor. nibh lorem.
    tincidunt. euismod. euismod.
    adipiscing lorem. magna magna. erat consectetuer.
    aliquam laoreet erat erat.
    sit nonummy ipsum. diam nibh. euismod dolore.
    amet sit nibh consectetuer. lorem dolor diam. tincidunt.
    tincidunt. nonummy lorem amet. nonummy euismod.
    adipiscing aliquam ut dolore. elit ut ipsum. nibh elit.
    sed dolor. ut sit elit. adipiscing.
    ut. ipsum amet sed. aliquam laoreet.
    diam amet aliquam consectetuer. consectetuer erat lorem. lorem.
    aliquam consectetuer sit. nonummy ipsum. consectetuer lorem.
    tincidunt. dolor aliquam. adipiscing.
    adipiscing ut.
    magna adipiscing. tincidunt sed. consectetuer lorem.
    tincidunt. erat diam. laoreet.
    nibh. magna ut. laoreet aliquam.
    ipsum aliquam nonummy amet. dolore. elit dolore.
    dolor laoreet dolor adipiscing. magna. aliquam.
    consectetuer lorem nibh. nibh adipiscing ut. nonummy ut.
  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. adipiscing amet euismod.

      consectetuer aliquam nibh tincidunt dolor sit dolore elit dolor consectetuer. elit diam elit amet erat adipiscing erat nibh sed elit.

      dolore dolor euismod consectetuer dolore euismod diam lorem. nonummy sit adipiscing adipiscing erat erat ipsum diam. dolor magna sed nibh nibh dolor amet dolor. tincidunt sit erat amet lorem ut tincidunt dolor. adipiscing euismod laoreet nonummy diam magna lorem laoreet.

    2. consectetuer lorem aliquam lorem elit magna.

      dolor adipiscing ut tincidunt aliquam nonummy euismod euismod euismod. amet erat laoreet nonummy sit erat adipiscing amet nonummy. erat consectetuer magna euismod aliquam adipiscing consectetuer aliquam ipsum.

    3. elit aliquam sed dolor lorem.

      euismod aliquam amet elit dolor diam. amet ipsum laoreet dolore erat tincidunt. sit adipiscing dolor lorem tincidunt diam. sed sed sed erat diam magna. diam lorem dolore ipsum adipiscing elit.

      sit aliquam ipsum lorem diam nonummy sed ipsum amet. sit amet laoreet diam diam lorem laoreet sed diam. nonummy nibh diam euismod tincidunt diam elit magna ipsum. euismod sit laoreet sed tincidunt lorem sit lorem sed. ipsum erat sit erat erat adipiscing amet dolore amet.

    4. dolore consectetuer aliquam magna euismod.

      amet nibh euismod nibh sed dolore aliquam sed ut. nonummy laoreet consectetuer diam euismod ut sed consectetuer nibh.

    5. magna amet consectetuer aliquam.

      magna nibh lorem euismod sit diam amet diam adipiscing nibh nonummy sit. sed laoreet ipsum tincidunt adipiscing tincidunt dolor sit nonummy diam nibh ipsum. laoreet magna ipsum adipiscing elit elit tincidunt magna lorem erat nibh sit. nonummy dolor dolor erat sed consectetuer ipsum tincidunt lorem sed ut tincidunt. laoreet nonummy aliquam amet sed euismod sed elit erat aliquam magna adipiscing.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

Popular Articles

Characteristics of MMAs

Read Article

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

An Overview of Fluid Dispensing Systems & How They’re Used

Read Article

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

Which answer best describes a project you are currently working on?
Set Time Test Methods
Set Time Test Method
Long
2.50 min The minimum amount of time required between when the bond is made and when it will support a 5 psi tensile load., Open times and set times are based on a room temperature environment. High temperatures will lengthen open times and set times while lower environmental temperatures will shorten open times and set times.
Viscosity Test Methods
Viscosity Test Method Temperature
9,000 cPs Measured on Brookfield viscometer with Thermosel using spindle #27. 121°C
Extrudable
Work / Pot Time Test Methods
Work / Pot Time Test Method
Long
4.00 min The bonding range of a 1/8" bead of molten adhesive on a non-metallic substrate., Open times and set times are based on a room temperature environment. High temperatures will lengthen open times and set times while lower environmental temperatures will shorten open times and set times.
Shear Strength Test Methods
Shear Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Substrate Test Time Test Temperature Test Method
1,570 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375"._x00D_ The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
2,250 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,490 psi Overlap shear strength Polycarbonate 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,280 psi Overlap shear strength Polyacrylic 23°C Substrate Failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were:_x00D_ plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
590 psi Overlap shear strength Polystyrene 23°C Substrate Failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
930 psi Overlap shear strength ABS 23°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
1,780 psi Overlap shear strength PVC 23°C Substrate Failure, Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
410 psi Overlap shear strength Maple 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens. These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
720 psi Overlap shear strength FRP 82°C Overlap shear (OLS) strengths were measured on 1" wide 1/2" overlap specimens.These bonds were made individually using 1" x 4" sample coupons. The thickness of the bond line was .003-.006". The thickness of the substrates were: plastics, .125", Maple, .375". The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute.
290 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C Room Temperature 50 % FRP 600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
530 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C Room Temperature 50 % FRP 3,600 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
1,470 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C Room Temperature 50 % FRP 86,400 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
2,250 psi Overlap shear strength 10,080 min 25°C Room Temperature 50 % FRP 604,800 sec 23°C FRP, Overlap Shear Strength (psi), tested @ 73°F (23°C) at various times after bonding. The FRP was conditioned for 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% RH prior to bonding.
Tensile Strength Test Methods
Tensile Strength Cure Time Cure Temperature Cure Humidity Test Method
3,300 psi 0.00 min 25°C 50 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), @ Break
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Substrate Test Temperature Test Method
90 piw 180° Peel strength FRP 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
95 piw 180° Peel strength Polycarbonate 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
54 piw 180° Peel strength Polyacrylic 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
50 piw 180° Peel strength Polystyrene 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
55 piw 180° Peel strength ABS 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
76 piw 180° Peel strength PVC 23°C Cotton duck failed during test, 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
51 piw 180° Peel strength Aluminum 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
62 piw 180° Peel strength Glass 23°C 180° peel strengths were measured on 1" x 8" pieces of flexible cotton duck (canvas) bonded to rigid 1" x 4" substrates. The rigid substrates were approximately .125" thick and the separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. All strengths were measured at 73°F (23°C).
16 piw T-peel strength Plasticized Vinyl 23°C Substrate failure, T-Peel strengths were measure on 1" wide pieces of plasticized vinyl at 73°F (23°C). The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. Plasticized Vinyl, T-Peel (piw), tested @ 73°F (23°C)
22 piw T-peel strength 0.00 min 71°C Plasticized Vinyl 23°C Substrate failure, T-Peel strengths were measure on 1" wide pieces of plasticized vinyl at 73°F (23°C). The separation rate of the testing jaws was 2" per minute. Plasticized Vinyl, T-Peel (piw), tested @ 73°F (23°C)
Elongation Test Methods
Elongation Test Method
700 % ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH), at Break
Modulus Test Methods
Modulus Test Method
5,400 psi ASTM D 638, Die C, measured on .011" - .017" thick films cured 7 days at 77°F (25°C)/50% relative humidity (RH)
Shore D Hardness Test Methods
Shore D Hardness Shore Hardness Test Method
45 1Measured on .090" - .110" thick bars
Density Test Methods
Density Test Method
9.1 (lbs/gal) Molten