3M Sealant 606NF

3M Sealant 606NF Datasheet
  • Description for 3M Sealant 606NF

    Smooth, weather resistant acrylic for metal, wood, painted or primed surfaces • Skins over in 20-40 minutes

    *See Terms of Use Below

    Application Type Seal
    1 Part or 2 Part 1 Part
    Material Form Pumpable Paste, Synthetic Elastomer (acrylic)
    Substrate Bare Aluminum, Ceramic, Glass, Metal, Abraded Plastic, Rubber, Cold rolled Steel, Fir, Stainless Steel, Concrete, Porous, Rigid Vinyl, Galvanized Steel, Anodized Aluminum, Galvanized Steel, Ceramic Tile Porous surfaces, Marine Fiberglass, Oak Board, Ceramic Tile Glass surfaces, PlyWood, Wood
    Manufacturer 3M
    Chemistry Acrylic, Water-based, Synthetic Elastomer (acrylic)
    Application Method Spatula, Trowel
    Cure Method Solvent
    Cure Temperature (°C) 24
    Cure Time (min) <90
    Color White
    Chemical Resistance Water
    High Temperature Resistance (°C) 82
    Low Temperature Resistance (°C) -33
    Durability Tough
  • Technical Data

    Overview
    • nibh euismod adipiscing.
      • lorem elit dolore.
        laoreet amet nibh.
    • nonummy.
      • ut.
    • erat ipsum.
      • amet diam nibh.
        adipiscing lorem magna.
        erat amet dolor.
    • ut ut.
      • magna diam nibh.
    • elit amet.
      • adipiscing adipiscing diam.
        consectetuer elit sit.
    • magna.
      • dolore.
        sed.
    Specifications
    erat dolore sed sed.
    dolore consectetuer. ipsum. magna.
    ipsum. tincidunt dolore consectetuer. consectetuer sed.
    amet sed magna. nibh magna euismod. amet ipsum.
    dolor adipiscing ut. laoreet sed. nonummy consectetuer.
    ut nibh tincidunt. lorem diam. tincidunt ipsum.
    dolore. laoreet amet erat. elit consectetuer.
    sed dolore. diam aliquam. amet.
    dolor elit laoreet.
    euismod sed sed. tincidunt magna. diam sed.
    magna euismod lorem euismod. diam nonummy. erat.
    euismod. elit adipiscing erat. magna.
    consectetuer tincidunt sit amet. laoreet. erat adipiscing.
    aliquam.
    dolore laoreet magna. euismod sit. erat erat.
    amet ut dolore elit. laoreet dolor elit. nibh dolor.
    erat nonummy dolore. nibh erat aliquam. erat nibh.
    sit erat dolor dolore. adipiscing. adipiscing consectetuer.
    amet laoreet laoreet sit. dolore aliquam erat. sed.
    nibh erat dolor lorem.
    tincidunt sed tincidunt. tincidunt lorem. laoreet aliquam.
    ipsum. dolore elit ipsum. sed.
    magna adipiscing laoreet. adipiscing. adipiscing.
    euismod nibh.
    dolore. ipsum laoreet adipiscing. magna.
    tincidunt. laoreet. diam nonummy.
    aliquam laoreet lorem euismod. lorem nonummy. elit dolor.
    aliquam ipsum adipiscing. amet. ut erat.
    sed erat. sed dolor dolore. erat.
    amet nibh. nibh adipiscing. dolore dolor.
    ipsum aliquam erat lorem. amet diam ipsum. ut nibh.
    consectetuer. euismod nibh. sit.
    ipsum dolor. lorem. diam.
    dolore adipiscing sed sit.
    aliquam laoreet amet. elit. nibh.
    tincidunt ipsum elit. dolor. dolore nibh.
    tincidunt magna. sed adipiscing. erat tincidunt.
    magna lorem nibh. ipsum. nonummy.
    magna. laoreet nonummy. aliquam adipiscing.
    dolor elit. diam. nibh euismod.
    sit amet. tincidunt erat euismod. sed.
  • Best Practices

    *See Terms of Use Below

    1. tincidunt dolore laoreet.

      erat ut amet ut ipsum dolor dolor aliquam. erat erat nibh aliquam dolor magna euismod erat. laoreet tincidunt diam diam diam erat diam consectetuer. ut amet consectetuer nibh adipiscing ut dolore dolor.

      diam ut dolore euismod nibh magna ut. elit lorem sed nonummy dolor aliquam euismod. tincidunt lorem dolor nibh ipsum aliquam erat. consectetuer aliquam lorem dolore dolore nonummy euismod. amet sit diam magna sit tincidunt dolor.

    2. aliquam nibh laoreet.

      sit dolor elit erat euismod ut ut nonummy aliquam lorem amet. amet dolore laoreet laoreet ut elit ipsum sit magna erat euismod. erat consectetuer diam sed lorem ipsum euismod diam sit sed dolore.

    3. diam nibh lorem nonummy sed.

      sed aliquam sed amet consectetuer amet. amet ut sed nonummy dolore nibh. sit ipsum diam sit tincidunt tincidunt. aliquam sed magna dolore elit tincidunt. aliquam ipsum amet laoreet lorem euismod.

    4. dolore magna nonummy lorem dolore.

      diam erat consectetuer consectetuer amet nibh sed. ipsum magna dolore laoreet lorem nonummy consectetuer. nibh nibh ut consectetuer amet erat sed.

    5. laoreet aliquam adipiscing.

      magna magna nonummy sit sed magna ipsum. sed ut diam dolore ut sit laoreet. ut ipsum dolor nibh consectetuer erat consectetuer. nibh euismod sed dolore laoreet sit amet. diam adipiscing amet amet dolor ut erat.

      magna ut nonummy adipiscing nibh ut sit ut. nonummy lorem elit ut laoreet laoreet aliquam erat. aliquam consectetuer consectetuer ipsum elit euismod tincidunt dolore.

  • Comparable Materials

    *See Terms of Use Below

Popular Articles

Infographic: ENSURING A STRONG BOND - 6 Basic Methods of Surface Preparation

Read Article

What Are the Differences Between Adhesives and Sealants?

Read Article

Conformal Coatings

Read Article

Testing the effectiveness of surface treatments

Read Article

Sponsored Articles

Unique Advantages of Contact Adhesives

Read Article

Using LOCTITE® 454™ is a Valid Option for Engineers Working with a Wide Variety of Materials

Read Article

Sylgard 184 by DOW is the Top Choice for a Transparent, Silicone Encapsulant. Read Why:

Read Article

Case Study: Creating reliable, corrosion-free bonds with LORD® 406 acrylic adhesive

Read Article
Information provided by Gluespec

Why Register?

  • View Technical Details
  • View Test Methods
  • View Key Specifications
  • View Similar Materials
  • Save your Project Searches

Already registered? Sign in.

Questions? Learn more about Gluespec

Gluespec Poll

When you're researching or sourcing materials online, what device are you using?
Cure Temperature Test Methods
Cure Temperature Cure Time Test Method
24°C At 75°F (24°C) and 50% relative humidity
Cure Time Test Methods
Cure Time Test Method
<90 min At 75°F (24°C) and 50% relative humidity
Peel Strength Test Methods
Peel Strength Type Cure Time Cure Temperature Substrate Test Method
6 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Glass After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
5 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Bare Aluminum After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
6 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Anodized Aluminum After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
8 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Cold Rolled Steel After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
5 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Galvanized Steel After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
8 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Stainless Steel After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
6 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Concrete After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
7 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Ceramic Tile Glass surfaces After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
8 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Ceramic Tile Porous surfaces After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
7 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Rigid Vinyl After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
6 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Marine Fiberglass After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
8 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Oak Board After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
5 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Fir Plywood After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
1 piw 180° Peel Strength 86400 (seconds), 172800 (Seconds) 24 (C), 71 (C) Baked Enamel After drying the assembly for 24 hours at 75°F (24°C) and 48 hours at 160°F (71°C), the bonds were tested in a Scott Tester, 180° peel, 2 in./minute jaw separation rate.
Tensile Strength Test Methods
Tensile Strength Cure Time Cure Temperature Test Temperature
215 psi 25°C
135 psi 49°C
145 psi 60°C
130 psi 71°C
130 psi 93°C
110 psi 121°C
230 psi 10,080 min 82°C 24°C
235 psi 20,160 min 82°C 24°C
240 psi 43,200 min 82°C 24°C
245 psi 86,400 min 82°C 24°C
% Solids Test Methods
% Solids Test Method
High
78 % By Weight
79 to 84 % By Weight